ChaseDream
搜索
1234下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 17013|回复: 39
打印 上一主题 下一主题

新破解第255题(GWD-12-Q19)

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2009-1-21 22:02:00 | 只看该作者

新破解第255题(GWD-12-Q19)

255.
            
(29858-!-item-!-188;#058&004408)     (GWD-12-Q19)

 

Heavy commitment by an executive to a course of action, especially if it has worked well in the past, makes it likely to miss signs of incipient trouble or misinterpret them when they do appear.

A. Heavy commitment by an executive to a course of action, especially if it has worked well in the past, makes it likely to miss signs of incipient trouble or misinterpret them when they do appear.

B. An executive who is heavily committed to a course of action, especially one that worked well in the past, makes missing signs of incipient trouble or misinterpreting ones likely when they do appear.

C. An executive who is heavily committed to a course of action is likely to miss or misinterpret signs of incipient trouble when they do appear, especially if it has worked well in the past.

D. Executives’ being heavily committed to a course of action, especially if it has worked well in the past, makes them likely to miss signs of incipient trouble or misinterpreting them when they do appear.

E. Being heavily committed to a course of action, especially one that has worked well in the past, is likely to make an executive miss signs of incipient trouble or misinterpret them when they do appear.

答案是E,怎么也想不明白。我搜了一下,网上以前对这题就有过讨论,包括新东方的老师都认为应该选C。但现在破解了,答案是E,没什么争得了,但有哪位牛人帮忙指点一下这是为什么?谢谢

沙发
发表于 2009-1-21 23:42:00 | 只看该作者

不是什么牛牛,小菜鸟一个,看了题,谈谈自己的看法。当然既然答案已经出来了,很多也不必争论了。谈谈各个选项的错误点吧,

A:有一个it的指代问题,前面一个it指代不清,同时后一个it指代是后面的不定式,我们知道一个句子中代词指代同一个对象。所以a错。

B:同样有不定代词one的指代问题,one和ones有不同的指代对象,句子结构是a executive who。。。,插入语,makes。。。经理。。造成。。不合逻辑。其次这个插入语的修饰对象不明,还有一点是改变了句子的合理重心,executive由从句部分变成了主语,而commitment变成从属成分。

C:who定语从句改变了句子合理重心,

D:being是多余,makes them中的them无指代对象。

E:重心未改变,one 指代 course 清楚,整个句子表达清楚。

所以选E。自己的一点点浅薄的看法~

板凳
发表于 2009-1-22 00:29:00 | 只看该作者
A: 第一個it指代a course of action...問題不太大; 第2個it邏輯上是指an executive, 可是文法上不可以用it指代inanimate thing.
B: 一個executive不會makes missing signs of incipient trouble...likely.  是那個heavy commitment.
C: it指代不清, 要指的a course of action非常遠
D: 兩個them的指代不一致
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2009-1-24 22:19:00 | 只看该作者
非常感谢二位的解答,二位都是牛人。
5#
发表于 2009-2-18 22:19:00 | 只看该作者
结构算是明白了,但这句话到底怎么翻译来着。。。
还有e中的they指代什么呢?
6#
发表于 2009-3-2 19:34:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用sjjay在2009-1-21 23:42:00的发言:

不是什么牛牛,小菜鸟一个,看了题,谈谈自己的看法。当然既然答案已经出来了,很多也不必争论了。谈谈各个选项的错误点吧,

A:有一个it的指代问题,前面一个it指代不清,同时后一个it指代是后面的不定式,我们知道一个句子中代词指代同一个对象。所以a错。

B:同样有不定代词one的指代问题,one和ones有不同的指代对象,句子结构是a executive who。。。,插入语,makes。。。经理。。造成。。不合逻辑。其次这个插入语的修饰对象不明,还有一点是改变了句子的合理重心,executive由从句部分变成了主语,而commitment变成从属成分。

C:who定语从句改变了句子合理重心,

D:being是多余,makes them中的them无指代对象。

E:重心未改变,one 指代 course 清楚,整个句子表达清楚。

所以选E。自己的一点点浅薄的看法~

D中加一点,it指代所有格形式,错误

7#
发表于 2009-3-3 01:53:00 | 只看该作者
umm...6th floor, it是指a course of action ;-)
8#
发表于 2009-3-3 10:11:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用snowlemon在2009-2-18 22:19:00的发言:
结构算是明白了,但这句话到底怎么翻译来着。。。
还有e中的they指代什么呢?

我是一个小菜鸟,想来求证一下....

Being heavily committed to a course of action, especially one that has worked well in the past, is likely to make an executive miss signs of incipient trouble
            or misinterpret
            them when they do appear.

them和they都是指signs of incipient trbouble,miss和misinterpret是并列的吧

Longman中

commit  v.的用法

▶SAY YOU WILL DO SOMETHING◀
[intransitive and transitive] to say that someone will definitely do something or must do something
commit somebody to something
Meeting them doesn't commit us to anything.

committed adj.的用法

meaning: willing to work very hard at something
The party has a core of committed supporters.
committed to
We are fully committed to Equal Opportunity policies

being committed to 在这里应该取哪个意思呢?

9#
发表于 2009-3-16 11:21:00 | 只看该作者
自己的问题自己解决,再做这一题的时候,看明白了,they指的就是signs of incipient trouble, 正如ls所说,they, them 都指的这个。

不才试着意译一下,见笑了:

当问题初现端倪的时候,过度偏执某种方法,尤其是那些过去屡试不爽的方法,很有可能让管理者忽视或曲解问题。

这年头,看懂了做题才快
10#
发表于 2009-3-16 14:09:00 | 只看该作者
我想翻下这句话吧:过于专注某个做法,特别是某个过去一直挺有效的做法,很可能会使主管发现不了初期的故障信号或者当信号出现时错误地理解他们.
A.commitment不如committed好.第一个it指代commitment还是a course of action不清晰。miss和misinterpret的行为者不清楚。至于后一个it指代后面的不定式我认为应该可以的吧,其实是属于it充当形式宾语,而实际宾语就是不定式to miss and too misinterpret..
B.An executive who is heavily committed to a course of action,把executive限定住了,改变句意.one的指代不清晰,是executive还是a course of action?;when they do appear的修饰对象错误.
executive makes missing...意思改变,逻辑错误。
C.An executive who is heavily committed to a course of action,把executive限定住了,改变句意.
最后的it离所指的a course of action太远不好.
D.it指代Executives' being heavily committed to a course of action不合理,逻辑上应该是指代行动/运行/执行过程。而且Executives' being heavily committed to a course of action太累赘了.个人觉得第一个them很明显是指代executives不会指代signs,因为一个作为misinterpret的主语(executives/第一个them),一个作为misinterpret的宾语(signs/第二个them),第三个they逻辑上就近与前一个them所指一致,所以没什么问题。
---------
关于“把executive限定住了”的说法做一个补充:
原句表达的是an executive处于某种情况下会发生的事情,而不是要表达“那种executive就以处于那种情况下为特征”。(有点难以表达,不过我觉得多读几次能读出来区别.)
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-1-15 10:05
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部