ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

In 1960's studies of rats, scientists found that crowding increases the number of attacks among the animals significantly. But in recent experiments in which rhesus monkeys were placed in crowded conditions, although there was an increase in instances of "coping" behavior-such as submissive gestures and avoidance of dominant individuals-attacks did not become any more frequent. Therefore it is not likely that, for any species of monkey, crowding increases aggression as significantly as was seen in rats.

Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?

正确答案: C

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 4285|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

求救CEer们,一道猴子和老鼠比较行为的题目

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-3-6 14:10:59 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
7. GWD28-Q7:

In 1960’s studies of rats, scientists found that crowding increases the number of attacks among the animals significantly.But in recent experiments in which rhesus monkeys were placed in crowded conditions, although there was an increase in instances of “coping” behavior—such as submissive gestures and avoidance of dominant individuals—attacks did not become any more frequent.Therefore it is not likely that, for any species of monkey, crowding increases aggression as significantly as was seen in rats.

Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?

A.All the observed forms of coping behavior can be found among rhesus monkeys living in uncrowded conditions.

B.In the studies of rats, nondominant individuals were found to increasingly avoid dominant individuals when the animals were in crowded conditions.

C.Rhesus monkeys respond with aggression to a wider range of stimuli than any other monkeys do.

D.Some individual monkeys in the experiment were involved in significantly more attacks than the other monkeys were.

E.Some of the coping behavior displayed by rhesus monkeys is similar to behavior rhesus monkeys use to bring to an end an attack that has begun.

答案C,我对E  C 都有疑问啊,能给这两个选项解释下吗
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2011-3-6 21:50:56 | 只看该作者
Easy. The author made a jump from one species of monkey to any species of monkey. It is a scope change which lacks support. C fixes that by saying the one species studied is the most easily provoked type.

E still talks about the one species. In that sense, E cannot fix the "any species of monkey" problem in the conlusion.
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2011-3-6 22:26:45 | 只看该作者
thxs a lot~I see!
地板
发表于 2013-6-25 20:45:30 | 只看该作者
jyw0411lsq 发表于 2011-3-6 22:26
thxs a lot~I see!

我擦。。。你怎么明白的。。。给我等屌丝解释一些。
5#
发表于 2013-6-25 20:49:33 | 只看该作者
The author made a jump from one species of monkey to any species of monkey.
结果发现选项和老鼠没关系。。中心句是一个猴子和很多猴子的关系。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-14 13:38
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部