OG verbal

GMAT760!! · 发表于 2019-8-2 16:06:55

Music critic: Fewer and fewer musicians are studying classical music, decreasing the likelihood that those with real aptitude for such music will be performing it. Audiences who hear these performances will not appreciate classical music’s greatness and will thus decamp to other genres. So to maintain classical music’s current meager popularity, we must encourage more young musicians to enter the field.

Which of the following, if true, most weakens the music critic’s reasoning?

AMost people who appreciate classical music come to do so through old recordings rather than live performances.
因此我们欣赏音乐的人是通过old recordings的，因此引不引进都没有时间
B It is possible to enjoy the music in a particular genre even when it is performed by musicians who are not ideally suited for that genre.
我觉得A，B都可以削弱
是不是因为A的话削弱更强一点

GMAT760!! · 发表于 2019-8-2 16:07:52

因为我觉得A，B都在破解逻辑链弹奏者的质量和人们欣赏没有关系

1998JIN · 发表于 2019-8-2 16:15:47

我觉得是的，像这种it is possible, some people 什么的感觉都很没有说服力

ST5 · 发表于 2020-7-24 23:38:42

我觉得两个都有削弱的效果，但是题目问的是most weaken，可以比较下这两个削弱的强度。
题目的推理逻辑是 classical学习的人少---有能力aptitude的performer少---audience不能appreicate---听其他音乐。所以要鼓励大家学习calssical。
A： MOST people是非现场来appreciate的，也就是破坏了最后一步的推理。听其他音乐由现场+非现场组成，即使现场少了，但是MOST people是非现场的。
B: It is possible to enjoy the music in a particular genre even when it is performed by musicians who are not ideally suited for that genre. B试图破坏第二步的逻辑（有能力的peformer---才能导致audience appreicate）。但是强度受到了影响：it is possible (到底多么possible？)， a particular genre(是不是classical)？not ideally suited（说的是合适而不是题目中提到的aptitude）。我认为能起到weaken的效果，但是强度不如A明显。

[逻辑小分队] OG verbal

所属分类: GMAT考试

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()