ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 3437|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

求NN指点!!!XDF讲义!

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-4-26 16:31:38 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
The presence of microorganisms that produce a toxin cause sea water to turn brownish red, phenomenon known as a red ride. Sea otters do not feed in areas where clams, their main source of food, have become contaminated with this toxin. According to a proposed explanation of the otter’s behavior, the otters sample the clams in a potential feeding area and can taste any toxin in them.
Which of the following, if true, would most strongly indicate that the hypothesis described in the last sentence of the passage is not correct?
(A) In some of the area where red tides occur, neither clams nor sea otters are indigenous species.
(B) The presence of sea otters in a given area has a significant effect on which other marine organisms are to be found in that area.
(C) When seawater in an area unaffected by red tide is artificially dyed brownish red, sea otters do not feed on the clams in that area.
(D) If the clams in a given areas are contaminated with toxin, sea otters move to other areas in search of food.
(E) Although very small amounts of the toxin produced during a red tide are not harmful, large doses can be fatal to animals the size of sea otters.
这道题答案给的是D,我选的C

我的理由:原文的逻辑是:有contaminated clams就没有otter→otter can taste toxin.
C答案说:给人工red(no toxin),也会没有otter→toxin不是原因→cannot taste toxin
d答案说有contaminated clams with toxin,就没有otter,是支持了结论啊

到底是我没想清楚逻辑关系还是答案有问题
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2011-4-26 17:20:17 | 只看该作者
就是选C吧,查了下以前的帖子,好像也有问这个的,估计答案印错了吧
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2011-4-26 18:50:44 | 只看该作者
嗯……我就找到一篇那位童鞋也觉得是C~~
谢咯~^^
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2011-4-26 18:52:00 | 只看该作者
嗯……我就找到一篇那位童鞋也觉得是C~~
谢咯~^^
5#
发表于 2011-6-13 18:18:43 | 只看该作者
我的理解是
c实际上在说:海域不受红潮影响(toxin),sea otters 就不吃那里的clams
                      根据A推出B=非B推出非A
                      转换为:sea otters所吃clams的海域是受红潮(toxin)影响的
                      这就意味着sea otters吃含有toxin的clams;且这片红潮海域有sea otters可以代表这片海域有clams
                      这个结论就是原文的结论
                      而题目是要削弱结论,而非加强,所以C不合理
D:如果这片海域有toxin, sea otters就游走了,去其他地方找食物了。
     明显,sea ottesr的数量不能说明这么海域中clams的数量;而且它们不吃含有toxin的clams
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-10-9 07:17
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部