ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1154|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[讨论]gwd 30-35,36

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2007-11-11 00:14:00 | 只看该作者

[讨论]gwd 30-35,36

GWD30-Q35 to Q37:

(The following was excerpted from

material written in 1988.)

 

      For over a decade the

            most common policy advice

            given to developing countries

Line     by international development

  (5)            institutions has been to copy

the export-oriented path of the

newly industrializing countries,

the celebrated NIC’s.  These

economies—Brazil, Hong

 (10)     Kong, Mexico, Singapore,

South Korea, and Taiwan—

burst into the world manufac-

turing market in the late 1960’s

and the 1970’s; by 1978 these

 (15)     six economies, along with India,

enjoyed unequaled growth

rates for gross national product

and for exports, with exports

accounting for 70 percent of

 (20)     the developing world’s manu-

            factured exports.  It was,

            therefore, not surprising that

dozens of other countries

attempted to follow their model,

 (25)     yet no countries—with the pos-

sible exceptions of Malaysia

and Thailand—have even

approached their success.  In

“No More NIC’s,” Robin Broad

 (30)     and John Cavanagh search for

the reasons behind these fail-

ures, identifying far-reaching

            changes in the global econ-

omy—from synthetic substitutes

 (35)
                   for commodity exports to

unsustainable levels of foreign

debt—as responsible for a glut

economy offering little room for

           new entrants.  Despite these

 (40)           changes, the authors maintain,

the World Bank and the Inter-

national Monetary Fund—the

foremost international devel-

opment institutions—have

 (45)            continued to promote the NIC

path as the way for heavily

indebted developing countries

to proceed.  And yet the futility

of this approach should,

 (50)            according to the authors, be

all too apparent so many years

into a period of reduced growth

in world markets.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Q35:

Given the information in the passage, which of the following is a true statement about the NIC’s?

                       

  1. Their economic success among developing countries has been exceeded only by the successes of Malaysia and Thailand.
  2. By 1978 they produced 70 percent of the world’s manufactured exports.
  3. In the late 1970’s, their growth rates for gross national product were among the highest in the world.
  4. In recent years their development has been heavily subsidized by major international development institutions.
  5. They received conflicting policy advice from international development institutions in the late 1960’s and the 1970’s.

Answer:

Q36:

The author of the passage most clearly implies that Broad and Cavanagh disagree with the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund about which of the following?

                       

  1. The ways in which the global economy has changed in recent years
  2. The causes of the unsustainable levels of foreign debt that the developing countries have incurred in recent years
  3. The level of foreign debt that should be maintained by developing countries
  4. The degree to which international development institutions should monitor the growth of developing countries
  5. The degree to which heavily indebted developing countries should emphasize exports in their overall economic strategy

35,我觉得应该选D, C没有指出GNP是highest,只说明了unequaled.

36我选的得是B, 答案是E, 没想明白,请指教

沙发
发表于 2007-11-11 11:16:00 | 只看该作者
For 35, why D, the passage did not even mention subsidies.
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2007-11-12 01:26:00 | 只看该作者
            the authors maintain,

the World Bank and the Inter-

national Monetary Fund—the

foremost international devel-

opment institutions—have

 (45)            continued to promote the NIC

path as the way for heavily

indebted developing countries

to proceed.

indebted developing countries是什么意思?受惠国吗?我看到promote,indebted这种,就觉得35应该选D,而且B明显不能推出它是highest的.

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-16 23:07
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部