ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 804|回复: 0
打印 上一主题 下一主题

逻辑

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2012-8-3 11:43:31 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
Many people argue that tobaccoadvertising plays a crucial role in causing teen-agers to start or continue smoking. In Norway, however, where there has been a ban on tobaccoadvertising since 1975, smoking is at least as prevalent among teen-agers as it is in countries that do not ban such advertising.


Which of the following statements draws the most reliable conclusion from the information above?




(a) Tobaccoadvertising cannot be the only factor that affects the prevalence of smoking among teen-agers.


(b) Advertising does not play a role in causing teen-agers to start or continue smoking.


(c) Banning tobaccoadvertising does not reduce the consumption of tobacco.


(d) More teen-agers smoke if they are not exposed to tobaccoadvertising than if they are.(A)


(e) Most teen-agers who smoked in 1975 did not stop when the ban on tobaccoadvertising was implemented.

不明白呀~~
有没有广告,吸烟还是一样流行,也就是说广告并不是一个factor啊,为什么B不对呢???
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-15 22:36
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部