ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 3015|回复: 5
打印 上一主题 下一主题

不理解,40--OG,看了前人的解释发现没人想过这个。求助

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-4-11 08:09:42 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
40. In the last decade there has been a significant
decrease in coffee consumption. During this same
time, there has been increasing publicity about the
adverse long-term effects on health of the caffeine in
coffee. Therefore, the decrease in coffee consumption
must have been caused by consumers’ awareness of
the harmful effects of caffeine.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously calls into
question the explanation above?
(A) On average, people consume 30 percent less
coffee today than they did 10 years ago.
(B) Heavy coffee drinkers may have mild withdrawal
symptoms, such as headaches, for a day or so
after significantly decreasing their coffee
consumption.
(C) Sales of specialty types of coffee have held
steady as sales of regular brands have declined.
(D) The consumption of fruit juices and caffeine-free
herbal teas has increased over the past decade.
(E) Coffee prices increased steadily in the past
decade because of unusually severe frosts in
coffee-growing nations.
我的思路
A 无关比例
B 支持
C无关
D有些支持,因为你消耗了大量的juice,有些像支持你对于咖啡认识变了。但是,主要还有无关的因素存在
E  我想说我不明白为什么这个正确,原文说increase significantly但是选项却说steadily价格平稳增加,我就不理解了如果是平稳增加的话怎么会有原文的事实:大幅度减少呢?按道理说每年增加一点,也不会造成某一个时候消费猛降吧?
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2011-4-11 09:03:10 | 只看该作者
Correlation and causation.

Two things happened together: 1) coffee consumption dropped; and 2) bad effects of coffee were publicized. Therefore, the author says that 2) caused 1) or "bad publicity of coffee led to the decrease in sale"!

Choice E) says that it is another reason - the price hike caused the drop in coffee consumtion. So E) provides an alternative explanation for 1) to happen. E) is a weakener.
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2011-4-12 15:34:14 | 只看该作者
题目中是“下降significantly大!”但是,选项Esteadly怎么对应题目中的价格狂降这种情况呢?
地板
发表于 2011-4-13 10:30:11 | 只看该作者
每年增加一点, then after a decade . . .
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2011-4-16 16:35:00 | 只看该作者
每年增加一点, then after a decade . . .
-- by 会员 sdcar2010 (2011/4/13 10:30:11)


那样按你说的,那个 题目中的in the last decade不等于E中的 in the past decade吗?如果等于的话,还是说明不了情况,因为同一个decade平稳增加就更不可能了。。
求解
6#
发表于 2011-4-16 19:02:17 | 只看该作者
题目中的in the last decade和选项中的in the past decade无关,题目中的时间段是和题目中人们对咖啡的认识的时间段吻合,没有必要和选项中的时间段吻合。选项只是提出另一种weaken的因素,是weaken哦不是completely destroy. 个人是这样理解的嘿嘿~
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-4-17 08:05
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部