ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2300|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

一道GRE&lsat逻辑题求解释

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-4-14 21:41:05 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
A small dose of a widely used tranquilizer allows people to lie during lie detector tests without being discovered. The stress
responses that lie detector tests measure can be inhibited by the drug without noticeable side effects. One of the implications
of this fact is that the drug can also be effective in reducing stress in everyday situations.

An assumption of the passage is that

A tranquilizers are always an effective treatment for stress
B the inhibition of stress responses increases subjective stress
C stress as measured by a lie detector is similar to every-day stress
D persons who lie during a lie detector test always display signs of stress  
E it is not desirable to reduce stress in everyday situations

OA怎么不是D捏?
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2011-4-14 21:48:46 | 只看该作者
求解释,有木有
板凳
发表于 2011-4-14 22:55:12 | 只看该作者
C是正确答案?取非,如果不是类似的,那就不好直接用了。
D这个不是假设,取非啊,如果并不总是表现压力,也不影响文章。文章成立并没要一定表现压力
地板
发表于 2011-4-15 11:25:51 | 只看该作者
This is a sufficient assumption.

Premise: Drug can inhibit stress response measured by a lie detector. D can inhibit A.

Conclusion: Drug can mitigate every-day stress. D can inhibit B.

Well, if A = B, and D can inhibit A, of couse D can inhibit B.

C says A equals B.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-14 12:17
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部