- UID
- 579779
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2010-11-3
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
When people predict that certain result will not take place unless a certain action is taken, they believe that they have learned that the prediction is correct when the action is taken and the result occurs. On reflection, however, it often becomes clear that the result admits of more than one interpretation.
Premise: When people predict "certain result requires certain action," they believe that they have learned that "when the action is taken and the result occurs, their prediction is correct."
Conclusion: But on reflection, it often becomes clear that the result has more than one interpretation.
What these statements are saying is that "Although one can predict certain result requires certain action, but when the action is taken and the result is shown, one is NOT certain that the action DOES cause the result since there are more than one way to explain the result. Therefore, one is not sure to say the original prediction is correct." In other words, one cannot tell if the prediction is correct simply because the action and the result happens sequentially.
D supports the conlucion that it is hard to confirm a prediction as correct because if D is right, one would have a hard time to tell a correct prediction from an incorrect prediction. |
|