ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 3089|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

怎么回事?逻辑一题!

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-4-10 23:06:43 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
During the past year, Pro-Tect Insurance Company’s total payouts on car-theft claims were larger than the company can afford to sustain.Pro-Tect cannot reduce the number of car-theft policies it carries, so cannot protect itself against continued large payouts that way.Therefore, Pro-Tect has decided to offer a discount to holders of car-theft policies whose cars have antitheft devices.Many policyholders will respond to the discount by installing antitheft devices, since the amount of the discount will within two years typically more than cover the cost of installation.Thus, because cars with antitheft devices are rarely stolen, Pro-Tect’s plan is likely to reduce its annual payouts.

In the argument above, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

  1. The first rules out a certain strategy for achieving a goal; the second presents the strategy that was adopted instead and whose effectiveness the argument assesses.

  2. The first is a judgment made in support of a certain conclusion; the second is that conclusion.

怎么会是A?第二个才是某个战略啊!
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2011-4-11 08:37:10 | 只看该作者
"[R]educe the number of car-theft policies it carries" is the first strategy which won't work, according to the author.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-10 08:26
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部