不懂啊！！求解释！！！谢谢啦！！

qumiao11111 · 发表于 2011-4-19 22:41:41

一道逻辑题
Magazine editor: I know that some of our regular advertisers have been pressuring us to give favorable mention to their products in our articles, but they should realize that for us to yield to their wishes would actually be against their interests. To remain an effective advertising vehicle we must have loyal readership, and we would soon lose that readership if our readers suspect that our editorial integrity has been compromised by pandering to advertisers.

the magazine editor's argument assumes which one of the following?
(B)the magazine cannot give any favorable mention in its articles to its regular advertises without compromising its reputation for editorial integrity.
(C)favorable mention of their products in the magazine's articles is of less value to the advertisers than is the continued effectiveness of the magazine as an advertising vehicle

答案是C，我选的B，我现在明白C为什么是对的了，但我还是不明白B为什么是错的。。。。知道的好心人帮忙解释下啊，不胜感激啊

sdcar2010 · 发表于 2011-4-20 10:45:40

B is too restrictive. Remember, in most cases, an extremely restrictive statement cannot be a necessary assumption.

qumiao11111 · 发表于 2011-4-22 22:04:30

谢谢，真的甚有启发啊

不懂啊！！求解释！！！谢谢啦！！

所属分类: GMAT考试

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()