ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 3295|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD-TN-10 Q29这道题目到底选哪个啊~~(考古了,一头雾水)

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-2-14 10:23:56 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
GWD-10-Q29:GWD-2-14
SmithtownUniversity’s fund-raiserssucceeded in getting donations from 80 percent of the potential donors they contacted.  Thissuccess rate, exceptionally high for university fund-raisers, does not indicate that they were doing a good job.  On the contrary, since the people most likely to donate are those who have donated in the past, good fund-raisers constantly try less-likely prospects in an effort to expand the donor base.  The high success rate shows insufficient canvassing effort.

Which of the following, if true, provides more support for the argument?

A.    SmithtownUniversity’s fund-raisers were successful in their contacts with potential donors who had never given before about as frequently as were fund-raisers for other universities in their contacts with such people.
B.    This year the average size of the donations to SmithtownUniversity from new donors when the university’s fund-raisers had contacted was larger than the average size of donations from donors who had given to the university before.
C.    This year most of the donations that came to SmithtownUniversity from people who had previously donated to it were made without the university’s fund-raisers having made any contact with the donors.
D.    The majority of the donations that fund-raiserssucceeded in getting for SmithtownUniversity this year were from donors who had never given to the university before.
E.    More than half of the money raised by SmithtownUniversity’s fund-raisers came from donors who had never previously donated to the university.
答案选A,我选C

ostIndexAlias=re%3a%e6%a5%bc%e4%b8%bb+%e9%a3%8e%e6%9e%97%e7%81%ab%e5%b1%b1" target="_blank">回复引用
举报使用道具TOP

GWD-10-Q29:GWD-2-14
SmithtownUniversity’s fund-raiserssucceeded in getting donations from 80 percent of the potential donors they contacted.  Thissuccess rate, exceptionally high for university fund-raisers, does not indicate that they were doing a good job.  On the contrary, since the people most likely to donate are those who have donated in the past, good fund-raisers constantly try less-likely prospects in an effort to expand the donor base.  The high success rate shows insufficient canvassing effort.

Which of the following, if true, provides more support for the argument?

A.    SmithtownUniversity’s fund-raisers were successful in their contacts with potential donors who had never given before about as frequently as were fund-raisers for other universities in their contacts with such people.
B.    This year the average size of the donations to SmithtownUniversity from new donors when the university’s fund-raisers had contacted was larger than the average size of donations from donors who had given to the university before.
C.    This year most of the donations that came to SmithtownUniversity from people who had previously donated to it were made without the university’s fund-raisers having made any contact with the donors.
D.    The majority of the donations that fund-raiserssucceeded in getting for SmithtownUniversity this year were from donors who had never given to the university before.
E.    More than half of the money raised by SmithtownUniversity’s fund-raisers came from donors who had never previously donated to the university.
答案选A,我选C

ostIndexAlias=re%3a%e6%a5%bc%e4%b8%bb+%e9%a3%8e%e6%9e%97%e7%81%ab%e5%b1%b1" target="_blank">回复引用
举报使用道具TOP

GWD-10-Q29:GWD-2-14
SmithtownUniversity’s fund-raiserssucceeded in getting donations from 80 percent of the potential donors they contacted.  Thissuccess rate, exceptionally high for university fund-raisers, does not indicate that they were doing a good job.  On the contrary, since the people most likely to donate are those who have donated in the past, good fund-raisers constantly try less-likely prospects in an effort to expand the donor base.  The high success rate shows insufficient canvassing effort.

Which of the following, if true, provides more support for the argument?

A.    SmithtownUniversity’s fund-raisers were successful in their contacts with potential donors who had never given before about as frequently as were fund-raisers for other universities in their contacts with such people.
B.    This year the average size of the donations to SmithtownUniversity from new donors when the university’s fund-raisers had contacted was larger than the average size of donations from donors who had given to the university before.
C.    This year most of the donations that came to SmithtownUniversity from people who had previously donated to it were made without the university’s fund-raisers having made any contact with the donors.
D.    The majority of the donations that fund-raiserssucceeded in getting for SmithtownUniversity this year were from donors who had never given to the university before.
E.    More than half of the money raised by SmithtownUniversity’s fund-raisers came from donors who had never previously donated to the university.
答案选A,我选C

ostIndexAlias=re%3a%e6%a5%bc%e4%b8%bb+%e9%a3%8e%e6%9e%97%e7%81%ab%e5%b1%b1" target="_blank">回复引用
举报使用道具TOP

GWD-TN-10 Q29 请大家帮忙解答一下
GWD-10-Q29:GWD-2-14
SmithtownUniversity’s fund-raiserssucceeded in getting donations from 80 percent of the potential donors they contacted.  Thissuccess rate, exceptionally high for university fund-raisers, does not indicate that they were doing a good job.  On the contrary, since the people most likely to donate are those who have donated in the past, good fund-raisers constantly try less-likely prospects in an effort to expand the donor base.  The high success rate shows insufficient canvassing effort.

Which of the following, if true, provides more support for the argument?

A.    SmithtownUniversity’s fund-raisers were successful in their contacts with potential donors who had never given before about as frequently as were fund-raisers for other universities in their contacts with such people.
B.    This year the average size of the donations to SmithtownUniversity from new donors when the university’s fund-raisers had contacted was larger than the average size of donations from donors who had given to the university before.
C.    This year most of the donations that came to SmithtownUniversity from people who had previously donated to it were made without the university’s fund-raisers having made any contact with the donors.
D.    The majority of the donations that fund-raiserssucceeded in getting for SmithtownUniversity this year were from donors who had never given to the university before.
E.    More than half of the money raised by SmithtownUniversity’s fund-raisers came from donors who had never previously donated to the university.
GWD答案是A,选项C 也很有争议,因为看了一年前多 的帖子好像有不少NN认为C也对,、
更郁闷的是AC 怎么解释,都能解释成加强, 感觉很怪异啊!
谁来说说~~谢谢!  
具体AC两个选项改如何去想~~
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2011-2-14 11:26:27 | 只看该作者
C is out of scope because the stimulus focuses on the successful rate of 80% among the potential donors the fund-raisers CONTACTED.  Who cares about those the fund-raisers did not contact?  It has no impact on the argument.

On the other hand, A is a strengthener. In the stimulus, the premise says that “the people most likely to donate are those who have donated in the past.”  The author is building a case against the 80% successful rate as a bench mark for a job well-done.  Rather, the author accuses the fund-raisers with a not-so-good canvassing effort based on the 80% success rate, implying that they did not find NEW donors more efficiently than fund-raisers in other universities.  If A is true, then they were only as “successful in their contacts with potential donors who had never given before” as other universities. Thus, they must have concentrated on the people that have donated before in order to get the 80% success rate.
板凳
发表于 2011-3-12 00:52:35 | 只看该作者
楼上正解,此题C是陷阱,容易看出来的
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-12-13 06:02
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部