ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1889|回复: 6
打印 上一主题 下一主题

sos 请大家帮忙分析一道题呗

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-3-8 21:37:25 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
5.In several cities, the government is going ahead with ambitious construction projects despite the high office vacancy rates in those cities. The vacant offices, though available for leasing, unfortunately do not meet the requirements for the facilities needed, such as court houses and laboratories. The government, therefore, is not guilty of any fiscal wastefulness.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument above depends?

(A) Adaptation of vacant office space to meet the government’s requirements, if possible, would not make leasing such office space a more cost-effective alternative to new construction.

(B) The government prefers leasing facilities to owning them in cases where the two alternatives are equally cost-effective.

(C) If facilities available for leasing come very close to meeting the government’s requirements for facilities the government needs, the government can relax its own requirements slightly and consider those facilities in compliance.

(D) The government’s construction projects would not on being completed, add to the stock of facilities available for leasing in the cities concerned.
(E) Before embarking on any major construction project, the government is required by law to establish beyond any reasonable doubt that there are no alternatives that are most cost-effective.





答案是A
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2011-3-8 22:49:42 | 只看该作者
Necessary assumption? Use negation!

If you negate A, you get "Adaptation of vacant office space to meet the government’s requirements, if possible, would make leasing such office space a more cost-effective alternative to new construction." If so, adaptation of vacant office should be the money-saving choice for the government to solve the current problems and the conclusion of the argument (government is not wasting money when building more office space) falls apart. Therefore, A is the necessary assumption.
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2011-3-9 09:17:17 | 只看该作者

还不是很懂

对这个逻辑的意思不是很理解 能把题目跟选项都翻译一下么
地板
发表于 2011-3-9 12:56:40 | 只看该作者
i do believe with you, but i claim that  "E"  can also have the same function as the answerA
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2011-3-9 17:21:00 | 只看该作者

求牛人翻译

同上~~~~~~~~把这道题目全都翻译出来呗
6#
发表于 2011-3-9 17:29:43 | 只看该作者
同求~~~
7#
发表于 2011-3-9 20:08:18 | 只看该作者
E is too restrictive to be an assumption. "beyond any reasonable doubt" and "no alternative" are both strong words.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-27 04:03
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部