- UID
- 579779
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2010-11-3
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
This is a simple question in terms of logic.
Premise: 1) when demand is high, more money is spent for saftey precautions and machinery maintenance than when demand is low. Conclusion: The average number of work-related accidents per employee per month should be lower when demand is high than when demand is low.
The assumption is that 1) NOTHING else changes or matters when comparing safety data between high demand period and low demand period; 2) more money spent on safety precaustions and machinery maintenance will lead to reduction on accident rate per worker.
To weaken this argument, you need to find a condition, if true, casts more doubt on the argument. One way to do this is to attack the assumptions. B simply does that by pointing out one key difference between the two periods - new workers are hired during the high demand period. These workers lack safety training and would be accident-prone during the high demand period. Thus, the argument is weakened. |
|