ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 3037|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GAMT&LSAT CR ——TEST I—— 第4题

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-7-22 16:26:36 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
Television programming experts maintain that with each 1% increase in the prime-time ratings of a television station there is a 3.5% increase in the number of people who watch its evening news program. However, in the last ten years at Channel NTR, there was only one year of extremely high prime-time ratings and during that year, fewer people than ever watched Channel NTR’s evening news program.

Which of the following conclusions can properly be drawn from the statements above?

(A) When a news program has good ratings, the channel as a whole will have good ratings.
(B) The programming experts neglected to consider daytime news programs.
(C) The year of high ratings at NTR was a result of two hit shows which were subsequently canceled because of contractual problems.
(D) The ten-year period in question is not representative of normal viewing patterns.(E)
(E) Prime-time ratings are not the only factor affecting how many people watch an evening news program.

选E,不明白,我怎么觉得C更合理,因为它解释了文中的这个特例发生的原因

不知哪位大侠可以帮忙讲解一下
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2011-7-23 00:49:28 | 只看该作者
Inference question has to be 100% correct based on the info in the stimulus. You cannot bring in your own prediction or opinion.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-10-2 20:28
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部