ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1650|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

gwd 7 14 (已查前帖 D選項思維整理)

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-5-19 15:00:50 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
GWD-7-14 zai
Certain politicians in the country of Birangi argue that a 50 percent tax on new automobiles would halt the rapid increase of automobiles on Birangi’s roads and thereby slow the deterioration of Birangi’s air quality.  Although most experts agree that such a tax would result in fewer Birangians buying new vehicles and gradually reduce the number of automobiles on Birangi’s roads, they contend that it would have little impact on Birangi’s air-quality problem.




Which of the following, if true in Birangi, would most strongly support the experts’ contention about the effect of the proposed automobile tax on Birangi’s air-quality problem?

      A  Automobile emissions are the largest single source of air pollution.

    B  Some of the proceeds from the new tax would go toward expanding the nonpolluting commuter rail system.
    C  Currently, the sales tax on new automobiles is considerably lower than 50 percent.
    D   Automobiles become less fuel efficient and therefore contribute more to air pollution as they age.
    E   The scrapping of automobiles causes insignificant amounts of air pollution.

    是D
    我對D的理解是這樣
    無論new cars 或 old cars(注意題目寫new automobiles的範圍包括new cars和old cars) 都會隨著使用年數增長而不省油 造成對空氣更多污染
    也就是說 old cars + new cars=automobiles  兩者的排放量都因年紀增長 對空氣造成雙倍污染

    請問這樣理解適當嗎?
    收藏收藏 收藏收藏
    沙发
    发表于 2011-5-19 15:15:16 | 只看该作者
    我觉得你的理解应该是正确的。
    因为原句说in fewer Birangians buying new vehicles ,就是少买了新的车辆。
    D答案说,as they age.随着时间的增长,车会便得越来越没有燃油的效率。
    support的题目充分必要都可以做条件。这个条件支持了that it would have little impact on Birangi’s air-quality problem.这个结论
    您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

    Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

    手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-6 05:04
    京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

    ChaseDream 论坛

    © 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

    返回顶部