哦哦~sdcar2010NN的math problem的意思我终于懂了~
其实我感觉好像最重要的不是trace那里,而是however后面的“the change will not allow more TDX on fruit than was allowed in the 1960’s”,可以理解成以前现在不超过0.5含量的TDX都不算违规,而1960年只能检验出1以上的含量,1以下的就被认为是无TDX残留。也就是说非1960年的范围是>1,非现在的范围是>0.5。就正好对应了“the change will not allow more TDX on fruit than was allowed in the 1960’s”。
It's a math problem with reading comprehension as a means. Premise: In 1960's, fruit found with TDX on it will not be on sale. The conclusion says the the new regulation (to allow certain fruit with TDX level lower than a standard to be on sale) would not allow more TDX on fruit than allowed in 1960's. The reason? In 1960's, the level of TDX can be detected on the fruit is higher than the standard chosen by the new regulation. In other words, fruits having TDX amount lower than the standard had already been on sale in 1960's. -- by 会员 sdcar2010 (2011/6/21 0:23:03)
|