ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1746|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

HELP......THANKS SO MUCH

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-11-16 19:55:38 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
41 GWD-29-Q28
Astronomer:Observations of the Shoemaker-Levi comet on its collision course with Jupiter showed that the comet broke into fragments before entering Jupiter’s atmosphere in 1994, but they did not show how big those fragments were.Nevertheless, some indication of their size can be inferred from spectrographic analyses of Jupiter’s outer atmosphere.After the fragments’ entry, these analyses revealed unprecedented traces of sulfur.The fragments themselves almost certainly contained no sulfur, but astronomers believe that the cloud layer below Jupiter’s outer atmosphere does contain sulfur.Since sulfur would have seeped into the outer atmosphere if comet fragments had penetrated this cloud layer, it is likely that some of the fragments were at least large enough to have passed through Jupiter’s outer atmosphere without being burned up.

In the astronomer’s argument, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?B

A.The first is a claim that the astronomer seeks to show is true; the second provides evidence in support of the truth of that claim.为什么不选??

B.The first and the second are each considerations advanced in support of the conclusion of the argument.

C.The first is a circumstance for which the astronomer seeks to provide an explanation; the second acknowledges a consideration that weighs against the explanation provided by the astronomer.
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2010-11-16 23:20:42 | 只看该作者
我尝试解答一下:

第一个黑体字,其实是指出一个质疑点,不过接下来就否定了这个质疑证据,所以目的是加强的结论的。

第二个黑体字,是用来解释第一个质疑点,以增强结论的。

所以说,两个都是用来支持结论的。不过,如果有更好的选项可以选择更好的。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-10-5 01:15
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部