ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2162|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

gwd

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-11-2 17:32:10 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
In American Genesis, which covers
    the century of technological innovation
    in the United States beginning in 1876,
Line    Thomas Hughes assigns special promi-
 (5)    nence to Thomas Edison as archetype
of the independent nineteenth-century
inventor.  However, Hughes virtually
ignores Edison’s famous contem-
porary and notorious adversary in
(10)    the field of electric light and power,
George Westinghouse.  This com-
parative neglect of Westinghouse is
consistent with other recent historians’
works, although it marks an intriguing
(15)    departure from the prevailing view
during the inventors’ lifetimes (and for
decades afterward) of Edison and
Westinghouse as the two “pioneer
innovators” of the electrical industry.
(20)         My recent reevaluation of Westing-
    house, facilitated by materials found
    in railroad archives, suggests that
while Westinghouse and Edison shared
important traits as inventors, they
(25)    differed markedly in their approach to
the business aspects of innovation.
For Edison as an inventor, novelty
was always paramount:  the overriding
goal of the business of innovation was
(30)    simply to generate funding for new
inventions.  Edison therefore undertook
just enough sales, product development,
    and manufacturing to accomplish this.
Westinghouse, however, shared the
(35)    attitudes of the railroads and other
industries for whom he developed
innovations:  product development,
standardization, system, and order
were top priorities.  Westinghouse
(40)    thus better exemplifies the systematic
approach to technological development
that would become a hallmark of modern
corporate research and development.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Q7:
The author of the passage implies that the shift away from the views of Westinghouse’s contemporaries should be regarded as

A.    a natural outgrowth of the recent revival of interest in Edison
B.    a result of scholarship based on previously unknown documents
C.    reflective of modern neglect of the views of previous generations
D.    inevitable, given the changing trends in historical interpretations
E.    surprising, given the stature that Westinghouse once had
求正确选项and why?
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2010-11-2 21:37:55 | 只看该作者
D?

This comparative neglect of Westinghouse is consistent with other recent historians’works, although it marks an intriguing departure from the prevailing view during the inventors’ lifetimes  of Edison and Westinghouse as the two “pioneer innovators”


红色部分对应 shift away from the views of Westinghouse's comtemporaries
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2010-11-4 22:04:33 | 只看该作者
答案先是C,被改了E
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2010-11-4 22:05:25 | 只看该作者
哎,阅读啊,看来我得下猛要了。。。。。
5#
发表于 2010-11-5 08:14:29 | 只看该作者
不好意思,打错了是E,解题点还是一样的。 “statue" --- " pioneer innovator" ; "shift away" --- "departure"; "intriguing"
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-8-30 20:51
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部