ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2105|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

提问OG12 78

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-10-12 21:25:50 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
78. A recent report determined that although only 3
percent of drivers on Maryland highways equipped
their vehicles with radar detectors, 33 percent of all
vehicles ticketed for exceeding the speed limit were
equipped with them. Clearly, drivers who equip their
vehicles with radar detectors are more likely to exceed
the speed limit regularly than are drivers who do not.
The conclusion drawn above depends on which of the
following assumptions?
(A) Drivers who equip their vehicles with radar
detectors are less likely to be ticketed for
exceeding the speed limit than are drivers who
do not.
(B) Drivers who are ticketed for exceeding the
speed limit are more likely to exceed the speed
limit regularly than are drivers who are not
ticketed.
(C) The number of vehicles that were ticketed for
exceeding the speed limit was greater than the
number of vehicles that were equipped with
radar detectors.
(D) Many of the vehicles that were ticketed for
exceeding the speed limit were ticketed more
than once in the time period covered by the
report.
(E) Drivers on Maryland highways exceeded the
speed limit more often than did drivers on other
state highways not covered in the report.

前辈们给出过如下解释:
这题的结论是:Clearly, drivers who equip their vehicles with radar detectors are more likely to exceed the speed limit regularly than are drivers who do not.
B说的driver是总体,带雷达不带雷达的车都算在内了,怎么无关了呢??....
条件1 3%的车装了radar
条件2 超速被开罚单的车中33%装了radar
结论  装radar的人比不装radar的人更likely to exceed the speed limit regularly

反问:如果那些没被抓的人更加容易超速呢?而这些人正好是没装雷达的?那结论就应该是没装雷达的人更容易经常超速 - 这正好和结论相反。

所以前提是:被抓的人比不被抓的人更加容易超速



但我的问题是,怎样就变成了反问?什-意思?怎样就推出反问这个结论了?
难道说反问的思路就是说当原文涉及到两种不同类型的事物A\B,题里的两个条件都说的是一方A了,结论涉及到两个东西的比较,那这道题的假设也得是比较?

还有,这道题如果按照你的方法进行反问,那就是说想两个B条件跟A条件相同出发点。然后就得出结论的反面假设。然后我再取非就可以对吗??
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2010-10-22 17:30:23 | 只看该作者
我先给大家算道题,因为有不少人在解释里面误人子弟。
设一共有a量车,0.03a有雷达,0.97a没有。一共被罚b辆车(题目明确告诉我们是被罚的“车”,而不是被罚的“车次”)0.33b有雷达,0.67b没有雷达。计算如下
有雷达的超速罚单率是0.33b/0.03a,没有雷达的超速罚单率是0.67b/0.97a,约分(小学数学,不用我讲吧?)前者大于后者,所以得出结论,有雷达的车更容易超速。
简单的逻辑是,有雷达的车超速罚单率高
→有雷达的车容易超速
为什么超速罚单率高就代表车容易超速呢?这个不一定吧?当然这是个很白痴的问题,为什么GDP高就代表综合国力强?为什么收视率高就代表人们喜欢?等等。所以B选项说超速罚单率高就代表车容易超速,你没的质疑,因为人家说了,就是!就是!就是!总不能去质疑选项中所说的是不是真的吧?呵呵,那就成了盗梦空间,梦中有梦了~ok,如果觉得我说的是正确的请回复我一下。错了的话,我们再讨论。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-23 09:03
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部