OG-10 157 怎么都想不明白···麻烦帮帮忙··谢谢啦·

dior_mickey · 发表于 2010-10-23 22:11:38

157. Companies O and P each have the same number of employees who work the same number of hours per week. According to records maintained by each company, the employees of Company O had fewer job-related accidents last year than did the employees of Company P. Therefore, employees of Company O are less likely to have job-related accidents than are employees of Company P.

Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the conclusion above?
(A) The employees of Company P lost more time at work due to job-related accidents than did the employees of Company O.
(B) Company P considered more types of accidents to be job-related than did Company O.
(C) The employees of Company P were sick more often than were the employees of Company O.
(D) Several employees of Company O each had more than one job-related accident.
(E) The majority of job-related accidents at Company O involved a single machine.

dior_mickey · 发表于 2010-10-23 22:13:06

我不明白为什么B对结论有削弱作用
怎么想都觉得很怪····
D到是有点削弱的意思不过用了several
麻烦谁帮我解答下啦····
谢谢~~！！！

honeybee316 · 发表于 2010-10-23 23:08:32

提干说：前提：O P2个公司有相同的员工员工的工作时间也一样
证据：在去年，O公司的员工比P公司的员工有更少的job-related accidents
结论是：O公司的员工比P公司的员工更不爱有job-related accidents
问哪个能削弱结论？
B ：Company P considered more types of accidents to be job-related than did Company O.
意思是说 P公司所认为的job-related accidents 包含更多种类的ACCIDENTS

公司可能包含ABCD O公司可能只有A
P公司定义的job-related accidents 与O公司定义的不一样
所以结论O公司的员工比P公司的员工更不爱有job-related accidents 被削弱了因为2种公司的job-related accidents 不一样不具有可比性

而D选项说一些O公司的员工每一个都有一件以上job-related accidents
这个并不能削弱因为结论说的是2个公司的对比
D选项读起来像是说明O公司员工有很多的job-related accidents
但是P公司的员工每人可以有4，5件 5，6件都可以没有给出2者的对比单单说O公司员工job-related accidents 的数量并不能说明什么
所以D选项无法削弱
个人看法~

dior_mickey · 发表于 2010-10-23 23:38:29

哦！！！
明白了！！！恩恩恩！！
谢谢啦~~！！！！

本贴相关题目 GMATPrep-2007E1-CR-63 (MEWB)

相关帖子

更多相关帖子

OG-10 157 怎么都想不明白···麻烦帮帮忙··谢谢啦·

所属分类: GMAT考试

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()