ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Studies in restaurants show that the tips left by customers who pay their bill in cash tend to be larger when the bill is presented on a tray that bears a creditcard logo. Consumer psychologists hypothesize that simply seeing a credit-card logo makes many creditcard holders willing to spend more because it reminds them that their spending power exceeds the cash they have immediately available.

Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the psychologists' interpretation of the studies?

正确答案: B

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 5079|回复: 5
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[求助]OG12 CR 94&114不明白论证思路,求教!!

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2009-10-26 21:50:00 | 只看该作者

[求助]OG12 CR 94&114不明白论证思路,求教!!

Studies in restaurants show that the tips left by
customers who pay their bill in cash tend to be larger
when the bill is presented on a tray that bears a creditcard
logo. Consumer psychologists hypothesize that
simply seeing a credit-card logo makes many creditcard
holders willing to spend more because it reminds
them that their spending power exceeds the cash they
have immediately available.
Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports
the psychologists’ interpretation of the studies?

(A) The effect noted in the studies is not limited to
patrons who have credit cards.
(B) Patrons who are under financial pressure from
their credit-card obligations tend to tip less when
presented with a restaurant bill on a tray with a
credit-card logo than when the tray has no logo.
(C) In virtually all of the cases in the studies, the
patrons who paid bills in cash did not possess
credit cards.
(D) In general, restaurant patrons who pay their bills
in cash leave larger tips than do those who pay
by credit card.
(E) The percentage of restaurant bills paid with a
given brand of credit card increases when that
credit card's logo is displayed on the tray with
which the bill is presented.

114. Guidebook writer: I have visited hotels throughout the
country and have noticed that in those built before
1930 the quality of the original carpentry work is
generally superior to that in hotels built afterward.
Clearly carpenters working on hotels before 1930
typically worked with more skill, care, and effort than
carpenters who have worked on hotels built
subsequently.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens
the guidebook writer’s argument?
(A) The quality of original carpentry in hotels is
generally far superior to the quality of original
carpentry in other structures, such as houses
and stores.
(B) Hotels built since 1930 can generally
accommodate more guests than those built
before 1930.
(C) The materials available to carpenters working
before 1930 were not signifi cantly different in
quality from the materials available to
carpenters working after 1930.
(D) The better the quality of original carpentry in a
building, the less likely that building is to fall into
disuse and be demolished.
(E) The average length of apprenticeship for
carpenters has declined signifi cantly since 1930.

两道OG12新题,感觉新加的题比OG11原有题要难,表述都怪怪的逻辑关系也不好理解,不知各位是否有同感?

谁能帮我解释下这两个题正确选项是如何得到的,怎么论证结论的。OG的解释看了还是不明白


[此贴子已经被作者于2009/10/26 21:50:56编辑过]
沙发
发表于 2009-10-27 00:26:00 | 只看该作者

第一题:hypothesize的点是CREDIT CARD LOGO~~

联系是:LOGO和TIP之间的关系

所以SUPPORT的肯定是和两者之间关系有关的选项。。。

所以定位B

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2009-10-27 11:55:00 | 只看该作者
谢谢楼上,可是还不明白究竟是怎么个论证法
地板
发表于 2009-11-10 09:47:51 | 只看该作者
参看这个: http://forum.chasedream.com/GMAT_CR/thread-410164-1-1.html?SearchText=og12 94
5#
发表于 2010-8-19 15:46:08 | 只看该作者
94题是异因异果的加强。114是他因的削弱。
6#
发表于 2010-10-17 20:39:44 | 只看该作者
还是不明白,怎么会是异因异果

原假设:有信用卡的人看到信用卡标识会觉得支付能力更强,会给更多小费。
而B:有信用卡还款压力的人看到信用卡表示会觉得支付能力弱,因此给的小费更少。

这两个怎么看也不是异因异果啊,因为原假设中只是所有有信用卡的人,而不只是有信用卡却没有还款压力的人,从这个角度看,我怎么觉得像是削弱了。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-26 04:47
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部