Environmental organizations want to preserve the land surrounding the Wilgrinn Wilderness Area from residential development. They plan to do this by purchasing that land from the farmers who own it. That plan is ill-conceived: if the farmers did sell their land, they would sell it to the highest bidder, and developers would outbid any other bidders. On the other hand, these farmers will never actually sell any of the land, provided that farming it remains viable. But farming will not remain viable if the farms are left unmodernized, and most of the farmers lack the financial resources modernization requires. And that is exactly why a more sensible preservation strategy would be to assist the farmers to modernize their farms to the extent needed to maintain viability.
In the argument as a whole, the two boldface proportions play which of the following roles?
请大家帮忙解释选D 的原因啊。。。先谢了 28. GWD-18-Q20Environmental organizations want to preservethe land surrounding the Wilgrinn Wilderness Area from residential development. They plan to do this by purchasing that landfrom the farmers who own it. That planis ill-conceived: if the farmers didsell their land, they would sell it to the highest bidder, and developers wouldoutbid any other bidders. On the otherhand, these farmers will never actually sell any of the land, provided thatfarming it remains viable. Butfarming will not remain viable if the farms are left unmodernized, and most ofthe farmers lack the financial resources modernization requires. And that is exactly why a more sensible (明智的)preservationstrategy would be to assist the farmers to modernize their farms to the extentneeded to maintain viability (发育能力).
In the argument as a whole, the two boldfaceproportions play which of the following roles?
A. The first presents a goal that the argument rejects asill-conceived; the second is evidence that is presented as grounds for thatrejection. B. Thefirst presents a goal that the argument concludes cannot be attained; thesecond is a reason offered in support of that conclusion. C. Thefirst presents a goal that the argument concludes can be attained; the secondis a judgment disputing that conclusion. D. The first presents a goal, strategies for achieving which are beingevaluated in the argument; the second is a judgment providing a basis for theargument’s advocacy of a particular strategy. E. Thefirst presents a goal that the argument endorses; the second presents a situationthat the argument contends must be changed if that goal is to be met in theforeseeable future.