- UID
- 480990
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2009-10-11
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
这篇文章太神奇了,文章和问题都明白了,但是不明白选项是来搞什么的,感觉和文章和问题都没什么关系的。
请教大N赐教。本人的困惑是 121、123 、124、127。问题我都标红了,感谢大家!
Jon Clark’s study of the effect of the modernization of a telephone exchange on exchange maintenance work and workers is a solid contribution to a debate that encompasses two lively issues in the history and sociology of technology: technological determinism and social constructivism. Clark makes the point that the characteristics of a technology have a decisive infl uence on job skills and work organization. Put more strongly, technology can be a primary determinant of social and managerial organization. Clark believes this possibility has been obscured by the recent sociological fashion, exemplifi ed by Braverman’s analysis, that emphasizes the way machinery refl ects social choices. For Braverman, the shape of a technological system is subordinate to the manager’s desire to wrest control of the labor process from the workers. Technological change is construed as the outcome of negotiations among interested parties who seek to incorporate their own interests into the design and confi guration of the machinery. This position represents the new mainstream called social constructivism. The constructivists gain acceptance by misrepresenting technological determinism: technological determinists are supposed to believe, for example, that machinery imposes appropriate forms of order on society. The alternative to constructivism, in other words, is to view technology as existing outside society, capable of directly infl uencing skills and work organization. Clark refutes the extremes of the constructivists by both theoretical and empirical arguments. Theoretically he defi nes “technology” in terms of relationships between social and technical variables. Attempts to reduce the meaning of technology to cold, hard metal are bound to fail, for machinery is just scrap unless it is organized functionally and supported by appropriate systems of operation and maintenance. At the empirical level Clark shows how a change at the telephone exchange from maintenance-intensive electromechanical switches to semielectronic switching systems altered work tasks, skills, training opportunities, administration, and organization of workers. Some changes Clark attributes to the particular way management and labor unions negotiated the introduction of the technology, whereas others are seen as arising from
the capabilities and nature of the technology itself. Thus Clark helps answer the question: “When is social choice decisive and when are the concrete characteristics of technology more important?”
121. Which of the following statements about the modernization of the telephone exchange is supported by information in the passage?(问的这点在文章中就一句话,OG后面的解释就是看了一片突然就得出这个结论了,觉得很无厘头) (A) The new technology reduced the role of managers in labor negotiations. (B) The modernization was implemented without the consent of the employees directly affected by it. (C) The modernization had an impact that went signifi cantly beyond maintenance routines. (D) Some of the maintenance workers felt victimized by the new technology. (E) The modernization gave credence to the view of advocates of social constructivism.
123. The information in the passage suggests that which of the following statements from hypothetical sociological studies of change in industry most clearly exemplifi es the social constructivists’ version of technological determinism?(OG的解释是constructists....as existing outside society, caplble of directly influencing skill and work organization, 但是文章的原话是 the alternative to constructists......as existing outside society, caplble of directly influencing skill and work organization 为什么啊,这不矛盾了嘛) (A) It is the available technology that determines workers’ skills, rather than workers’ skills infl uencing the application of technology. (B) All progress in industrial technology grows out of a continuing negotiation between technological possibility and human need. (C) Some organizational change is caused by people; some is caused by computer chips. (D) Most major technological advances in industry have been generated through research and development. (E) Some industrial technology eliminates jobs, but educated workers can create whole new skills areas by the adaptation of the technology.
124. The information in the passage suggests that Clark believes that which of the following would be true if social constructivism had not gained widespread acceptance?(不明白问题中这个if从句表示什么,widespread acceptance在文章中找不到重现和相关啊,啥意思?? ) (A) Businesses would be more likely to modernize without considering the social consequences of their actions. (B) There would be greater understanding of the role played by technology in producing social change. (C) Businesses would be less likely to understand the attitudes of employees affected by modernization. (D) Modernization would have occurred at a slower rate. (E) Technology would have played a greater part in determining the role of business in society.
127. Which of the following statements about Clark’s study of the telephone exchange can be inferred from information in the passage?(看不出来选项是怎么找出来的,对应的文章中的原话和问题没关系啊。。) (A) Clark’s reason for undertaking the study was to undermine Braverman’s analysis of the function of technology. (B) Clark’s study suggests that the implementation of technology should be discussed in the context of confl ict between labor and management. (C) Clark examined the impact of changes in the technology of switching at the exchange in terms of overall operations and organization. (D) Clark concluded that the implementation of new switching technology was equally benefi cial to management and labor. (E) Clark’s analysis of the change in switching systems applies only narrowly to the situation at the particular exchange that he studied. |
|