ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 7509|回复: 12
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG 12th P402 第22篇 2个人关于technological determinism and social constructivism

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2009-11-22 21:06:47 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
这篇文章太神奇了,文章和问题都明白了,但是不明白选项是来搞什么的,感觉和文章和问题都没什么关系的。

请教大N赐教。本人的困惑是 121、123 、124、127。问题我都标红了,感谢大家!

Jon Clark’s study of the effect of the
modernization of a telephone exchange on exchange
maintenance work and workers is a solid
contribution to a debate that encompasses two
lively issues in the history and sociology of
technology: technological determinism and social
constructivism.
Clark makes the point that the characteristics of a
technology have a decisive infl uence on job skills
and work organization. Put more strongly,
technology can be a primary determinant of social
and managerial organization. Clark believes this
possibility has been obscured by the recent
sociological fashion, exemplifi ed by Braverman’s
analysis, that emphasizes the way machinery
refl ects social choices. For Braverman, the shape of
a technological system is subordinate to the
manager’s desire to wrest control of the labor
process from the workers. Technological change is
construed as the outcome of negotiations among
interested parties who seek to incorporate their own
interests into the design and confi guration of the
machinery. This position represents the new
mainstream called social constructivism.
The constructivists gain acceptance by
misrepresenting technological determinism:
technological determinists are supposed to believe,
for example, that machinery imposes appropriate
forms of order on society. The alternative to
constructivism, in other words, is to view technology
as existing outside society, capable of directly
infl uencing skills and work organization.
Clark refutes the extremes of the constructivists
by both theoretical and empirical arguments.
Theoretically he defi nes “technology” in terms of
relationships between social and technical variables.
Attempts to reduce the meaning of technology to
cold, hard metal are bound to fail, for machinery is
just scrap unless it is organized functionally and
supported by appropriate systems of operation and
maintenance. At the empirical level Clark shows how
a change at the telephone exchange from
maintenance-intensive electromechanical switches
to semielectronic switching systems altered work
tasks, skills, training opportunities, administration,
and organization of workers. Some changes Clark
attributes to the particular way management and
labor unions negotiated the introduction of the
technology, whereas others are seen as arising from

the capabilities and nature of the technology itself.
Thus Clark helps answer the question: “When is
social choice decisive and when are the concrete
characteristics of technology more important?”

121. Which of the following statements about the
modernization of the telephone exchange is supported
by information in the passage?(问的这点在文章中就一句话,OG后面的解释就是看了一片突然就得出这个结论了,觉得很无厘头)
(A) The new technology reduced the role of
managers in labor negotiations.
(B) The modernization was implemented without the
consent of the employees directly affected by it.
(C) The modernization had an impact that went
signifi cantly beyond maintenance routines.
(D) Some of the maintenance workers felt victimized
by the new technology.
(E) The modernization gave credence to the view of
advocates of social constructivism.


123. The information in the passage suggests that which of
the following statements from hypothetical
sociological studies of change in industry most clearly
exemplifi es the social constructivists’ version of
technological determinism?(OG的解释是constructists....as existing outside society, caplble of directly influencing skill and work organization, 但是文章的原话是 the alternative to constructists......as existing outside society, caplble of directly influencing skill and work organization 为什么啊,这不矛盾了嘛)
(A) It is the available technology that determines
workers’ skills, rather than workers’ skills
infl uencing the application of technology.
(B) All progress in industrial technology grows out
of a continuing negotiation between
technological possibility and human need.
(C) Some organizational change is caused by
people; some is caused by computer chips.
(D) Most major technological advances in industry
have been generated through research and
development.
(E) Some industrial technology eliminates jobs, but
educated workers can create whole new skills
areas by the adaptation of the technology.


124. The information in the passage suggests that Clark
believes that which of the following would be true if
social constructivism had not gained widespread
acceptance?(不明白问题中这个if从句表示什么,widespread acceptance在文章中找不到重现和相关啊,啥意思??
(A) Businesses would be more likely to modernize
without considering the social consequences of
their actions.
(B) There would be greater understanding of the
role played by technology in producing social
change.
(C) Businesses would be less likely to understand
the attitudes of employees affected by
modernization.
(D) Modernization would have occurred at a slower
rate.
(E) Technology would have played a greater part in
determining the role of business in society.

127. Which of the following statements about Clark’s study
of the telephone exchange can be inferred from
information in the passage?(看不出来选项是怎么找出来的,对应的文章中的原话和问题没关系啊。。)
(A) Clark’s reason for undertaking the study was to
undermine Braverman’s analysis of the function
of technology.
(B) Clark’s study suggests that the implementation
of technology should be discussed in the context
of confl ict between labor and management.
(C) Clark examined the impact of changes in the
technology of switching at the exchange in
terms of overall operations and organization.
(D) Clark concluded that the implementation of new
switching technology was equally benefi cial to
management and labor.
(E) Clark’s analysis of the change in switching
systems applies only narrowly to the situation at
the particular exchange that he studied.
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2009-11-23 12:03:05 | 只看该作者
就对了3道。。
实在搞不懂这篇在弄什么,绕来绕去的
就知道J和B的观点不同
板凳
发表于 2009-11-23 21:28:45 | 只看该作者

随便说说我做的,请大家指正。
其实我也看不太懂,基本上是靠着文章的脉络,蒙出答案来的。

121. 41-46行,电话交换的技术进步,远远大于维护程序。举例了很多。连organization of workers 都有

123. 这个题是问SC对TD的态度是什么?我定位在 31, outside society,,, capable of direct influencing skills and work organizations,就是技术在SOCIETY之外,但是影响SOCIETY

我不明白你说的“矛盾”是什么

124.  SC是反对TD的,TD是CLARK的态度,如果SC不能大行其道,CLARK的观点就能立足。然后就选个CLARK观点就可以了。。。我感觉像主题题


127. infered from passage.找个切合文章主题的
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2009-11-24 07:28:29 | 只看该作者
矛盾是:OG的解释是constructists....as existing outside society, caplble of directly influencing skill and work organization, 但是文章的原话是 the alternative to constructists......as existing outside society, caplble of directly influencing skill and work organization 为什么啊,这不矛盾了嘛

定位的是:constructists 然后文章的内容是the alternative to constructists......as existing outside society, caplble of directly influencing skill and work organization

                                               OG的解释是constructists....as existing outside society, caplble of directly influencing skill and work organization,

矛盾由此得知,OG的主语和文章的主语是相反的。我的感觉是这样,所以做不出来

求解呢
5#
发表于 2009-11-24 15:21:12 | 只看该作者
你看原文不够细
OG的意思是
The constructivists gain acceptance by
misrepresenting technological determinism:
technological determinists are supposed to believe,
for example, that machinery imposes appropriate
forms of order on society. The alternative to
constructivism, in other words, is to view technology
as existing outside society, capable of directly
infl uencing skills and work organization.



C教徒,认为他们C教的对手是怎样怎样怎样的
6#
发表于 2009-12-9 18:38:16 | 只看该作者

这篇实在是太难了

我现在正看这篇,越看头越疼,这应该是这本书里最难得了
7#
发表于 2009-12-22 11:48:56 | 只看该作者
如果考试每一篇阅读都类似这个文章的难度,岂不是很糟?难怪大家非常重视jj了看懂这文章用了10分钟,居然还错4题(50%).呜呜.
8#
发表于 2010-1-9 15:33:28 | 只看该作者
仅次于OG12-12印第安水权了!!! 无语
9#
发表于 2010-1-9 16:09:59 | 只看该作者
124.  SC是反对TD的,TD是CLARK的态度,如果SC不能大行其道,CLARK的观点就能立足。然后就选个CLARK观点就可以了。。。我感觉像主题题
===124题即使定位正确了,我还是选折E了!  看不出来E和B之间为何选B!
10#
发表于 2010-1-26 15:41:09 | 只看该作者
LS.124 E,
这篇文章就没说role of business in society,迷惑我们呢GMAC~
不要被迷惑呵~
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-9-29 16:04
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部