ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 3616|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[0820]请教PERP逻辑2道题,我已思考了,求确定~谢谢~

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-8-21 13:46:22 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
43. (33475-!-item-!-188;#058&006874)
Paint on a new airliner is usually applied in two stages:  first, a coat of primer, and then a top coat.  A new process requires no primer, but instead uses two layers of the same newly developed coating, with each layer of the new coating having the same thickness and weight as a traditional top coat.  Using the new process instead of the old process increases the price of a new aircraft considerably.
Which of the following, if true, most strongly indicates that it is in an airline's long-term economic interest to purchase new airliners painted using the new process rather than the old process?
(A) Although most new airliners are still painted using the old process, aircraft manufacturers now offer a purchaser of any new airliner the option of having it painted using the new process instead.
(B) A layer of primer on an airliner weighs more than a layer of the new coating would by an amount large enough to make a difference to that airliner's load-bearing capacity.
(C) A single layer of the new coating provides the aluminum skin of the airliner with less protection against corrosion than does a layer of primer of the usual thickness.
(D) Unlike the old process, the new process was originally invented for use on spacecraft, which are subject to extremes of temperature to which airliners are never exposed.
(E) Because the new coating has a viscosity similar to that of a traditional top coat, aircraft manufacturers can apply it using the same equipment as is used for a traditional top coat.

这道题我虽然选对了,但是的感觉有点不确定,B的意思是不是说:旧的方法weighs more-->capacity比新的方法小?

50. (34317-!-item-!-188;#058&007562)
Generally scientists enter their field with the goal of doing important new research and accept as their colleagues those with similar motivation.  Therefore, when any scientist wins renown as an expounder of science to general audiences, most other scientists conclude that this popularizer should no longer be regarded as a true colleague.
The explanation offered above for the low esteem in which scientific popularizers are held by research scientists assumes that
(A) serious scientific research is not a solitary activity, but relies on active cooperation among a group of colleagues
(B) research scientists tend not to regard as colleagues those scientists whose renown they envy
(C) a scientist can become a famous popularizer without having completed any important research
(D) research scientists believe that those who are well known as popularizers of science are not motivated to do important new research
(E) no important new research can be accessible to or accurately assessed by those who are not themselves scientists

我选A, 正确为D.
A说research需要科学家合作
我理解的是 如果一个科学家获得了名望,就忽略了其他科学家@@ 我现在好像觉得自己想的方向就错了?

谢谢
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2010-8-21 14:28:53 | 只看该作者
43. 是这样理解的,load capacity 减少了,那乘客就少了,就不赚钱了
50。goal of doing important new research -----as colleagues.    
wins renown as of science to general audiences colleague.-----not as colleagues

wins renown as of science to general audiences colleague-----not have goal of doing....
搭桥
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-28 07:31
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部