ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1712|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

请教OG

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-7-16 16:14:14 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
"Life expectancy" is the average age at death of the entire live-born population. In the middle of the nineteenth
century, life expectancy in North America was 40 years, wherreas now it is nearly 80 years. Thus, in those days,
people must have been considered old at an age that we now consider the prime of life.


C. Many of the people who live to an advanced age today do so only because of medical technology that was
unknown in the nineteenth century.
D. The propotion of people who die in their seventies is significantly smaller today than is the proportiion of people
who die in their eighties.


今天重新做OG,想问问这两个选项如何支持argument???想不明白
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2010-7-16 18:24:32 | 只看该作者
你好像没有把题目说全,我记得不是这样的。原题是下面哪个答案weeken了argument,但不说明其它答案是support argument的,也可以是无关选项。这是做题目最基本的逻辑。这两个答案是无关选项。
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2010-7-20 12:16:37 | 只看该作者
哦,不是的,我知道这题是要求WEAKEN,但是这两个选项在OG的解释是SUPPORT的,我是不明白这两个选项如何起到支持作用。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-10-7 20:27
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部