ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1775|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

一道大全题目

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-6-18 10:06:18 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
17.Companies considering new cost-cutting manufacturing processes often compare the projected results of making the investment against the alternative of not making the investment with costs, selling prices, and share of market remaining constant.
Which of the following, assuming that each is a realistic possibility, constitutes the most serious disadvantage for companies of using the method above for evaluating the financial benefit of new manufacturing processes?
(A) The costs of materials required by the new process might not be known with certainty.
(B) In several years interest rates might go down, reducing the interest costs of borrowing money to pay for the investment.
(C) Some cost-cutting processes might require such expensive investments that there would be no net gain for many years, until the investment was paid for by savings in the manufacturing process.

(D) Competitors that do invest in a new process might reduce their selling prices and thus take market share away from companies that do not.
(E) The period of year chosen for averaging out the cost of the investment might be somewhat longer or shorter, thus affecting the result.

我选择了C,答案是D……请教各位大侠~
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2010-6-19 11:08:20 | 只看该作者
C选项中说到了some cost-cutting processes但是文中用的the new process 是不是属于这些some cost-cutting里面的呢,没有说,我们不知道,如果有的话就削弱,没有的话就是无关选项,同理A选项说到了原材料的成本uncertainy如果是低估了原材料的成本那么就是削弱,如果是高估了那么反倒是加强了,所以这样留有空间的选项不如E选项好。

E的话竞争的加入,你面临就两个选择要么降低价格要么降低你的market share这两种都是我们不愿意看到的
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-9 00:19
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部