11月CRJJ中的天山7-17 黑脸地方变了 请大家一起讨论

与天山-7-17类似，但是黑的地方变了。

As a large corporation in small country, Hachnut wants its managers to have international experience目的, so

each year it sponsors management education abroad for its management trainees要反驳的策略.（答案是要

被评价的策略。评价和反驳有什么不同呢？） Hachnut has found, however, that the attrition rate of

graduates from this program is very high, with many of them leaving Hachnut to join competing firms soon

after completing the program. 用来支持反驳的证据  Hachnut does use performance during the

program as criterion in deciding among candidates for management positions, 事实目标but both this

function and the goal of providing international experience could be achieved in other ways.用来反驳策略不

需要的基础 Therefore, if the attrition problem cannot be successfully addressed, Hachnut should

discontinue the sponsorship program. 结论，反驳开始的观点

请教一下大家，这道黑脸题，每一小句的作用。本月CRjj。但黑脸的地方变了，所以要把每句读搞清楚。

每句后面是我的想法。还请NN指正！

附原题

In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?

1. The first describes a practice that the argument seeks to justify; the second states a judgment that is used in support of a justification for that practice.

2. The first describes a practice that the argument seeks to explain; the second presents part of the argument’s explanation of that practice.

3. The first introduces a practice that the argument seeks to evaluate; the second provides grounds for holding that the practice cannot achieve its objective.

4. The first introduces a policy that the argument seeks to evaluate; the second provides grounds for holding that the policy is not needed.

5. The first introduces a consideration supporting a policy that the argument seeks to evaluate; the second provides evidence for concluding that the policy should be abandoned.

As a large corporation in small country, Hachnut wants its managers to have international experience目的, so

each year it sponsors management education abroad for its management trainees要反驳的策略.（答案是要

被评价的策略。评价和反驳有什么不同呢？） Hachnut has found, however, that the attrition rate of

graduates from this program is very high, with many of them leaving Hachnut to join competing firms soon

after completing the program. 用来支持反驳的证据  Hachnut does use performance during the

program as criterion in deciding among candidates for management positions, 事实目标but both this

function and the goal of providing international experience could be achieved in other ways.用来反驳策略不

需要的基础 Therefore, if the attrition problem cannot be successfully addressed, Hachnut should

discontinue the sponsorship program. 结论，反驳开始的观点是结论，但不是反驳，if not A，then not B，如果不能解决attrition的问题，那就别继续了，没说无论如何都不要用这个方法。

所以，第一句话，也不是作者反对的策略，而是他评价的策略。

个人理解，大家参考

 对呵，只是说此法不成功，就别干了。算评价。

Hachnut does use performance during the program as criterion in deciding among candidates for management positions

Hachnut does use performance during the program as criterion in deciding among candidates for management positions

这句的作用是什么呢？

use performance during the program as criterion in deciding among candidates for management positions

是这个做法（出国培训）的另外一个用处，或者说第二目的，have international experience是第一目的。