ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 5113|回复: 7
打印 上一主题 下一主题

问一道CR 大全 C-5 之前好像没有人问过

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-5-3 10:25:20 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
5.    At many colleges today, regulations have been imposed that forbid the use in speech or print of language that “offends” or “insults” the members of any group, especially women and racial, ethnic, and religious minorities. Although these regulations are defended in the name of “democracy,” they restrict freedom of speech and the press in a way that opposes the true spirit of democracy.
The argument above attempts to prove its case primarily by
(A) impugning the credentials of an opponent
(B) providing examples that support a theoretical principle
(C) taking advantage of inconsistencies in the definition of “democracy”
(D) revealing a contradiction in an opposing point of view
(E) appealing to the patriotic feelings of its audience

我选的是C,答案是D,百思不得其解,请NN指导!!!!
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2011-5-3 10:36:17 | 只看该作者
The last sentence "they restrict freedom of speech and the press in a way that opposes the true spirit of democracy." That is just what D says.
板凳
发表于 2011-5-3 10:37:25 | 只看该作者
If you choose C, then show me the definition of democracy in the stimulus. I cannot find it.
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2011-5-3 11:19:12 | 只看该作者
请问D的revealing a contradiction in an opposing point of view是什么意思?
5#
发表于 2011-5-3 11:26:51 | 只看该作者
pointing out a contradiction in an argument to which the author objects.
6#
 楼主| 发表于 2011-5-3 13:30:13 | 只看该作者
就是指出了作者反对的argument中的矛盾是吗?
7#
发表于 2011-8-3 15:18:10 | 只看该作者
高手
8#
发表于 2013-3-6 09:36:17 | 只看该作者
At many colleges today, regulations have been imposed that forbid the use in speech or print of language that “offends” or “insults” the members of any group, especially women and racial, ethnic, and religious minorities. Although these regulations are defended in the name of “democracy,” they restrict freedom of speech and the press in a way that opposes the true spirit of democracy.
The argument above attempts to prove its case primarily by
(A)impugning the credentials of an opponent
并没有“驳斥可信度”

(B) providing examples that support a theoretical principle
没有支持一个理论

(C) taking advantage of inconsistencies in the definition of “democracy”
没有提到民主的定义,而是the spirit of democracy,很有迷惑性

(D) revealing a contradiction in an opposing point of view
这些管制是以“民主”的名义,但是它们实际上却违背了“民主”的精神

(E) appealing to the patriotic feelings of its audience
跟爱国主义无关
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-11 15:26
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部