ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

The fewer restrictions there are on the advertising of legal services, the more lawyers there are who advertise their services, and the lawyers who advertise a specific service usually charge less for that service than the lawyers who do not advertise. Therefore, if the state removes any of its current restrictions, such as the one against advertisements that do not specify fee arrangements, overall consumer legal costs will be lower than if the state retains its current restrictions.

If the statements above are true, which of the following must be true?

正确答案: C

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 2887|回复: 6
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG-56

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-4-2 12:56:33 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
The fewer restricitions there are on the advertising of legal services, the more lawyers there are who advertise their services, and the lawyers who advertise a specific service usually charge less for that service than the lawyers who do not advertise. Therefore, if the state removes any of its current restrictions, such as the one against advertisments that do not specify fee arrangements, overall consumer legal costs will be lower than if the state retains its current restrictions.

If the statement above are true, which of the following must be true?

(A) Some lawyers who now advertise will charge more for specific services if they do not have to specify fee arrangements in the advertisements.
(B) More consumers will use legal services if there are fewer restrictions on the advertising of legal services.
(C) If the restriction against advertisements that do not specify fee arrangements is removed, more lawyers will advertise their services.
(D) If more lawyers advertise lower prices for specific services, some lawyers who do not advertise will also charge less than they currently charge for those services.
(E) If the only restrictions on the advertising of legal services were those that apply to every type of advertising, most lawyers would advertise their services.

答案选C
OG对E的解释是The argument concerns numbers of advertisers rather than types; it remains possible that few
lawyers would advertise.
这句话看不大明白,请NN们指教!
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2010-4-2 13:17:21 | 只看该作者
选C?
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2010-4-2 13:31:28 | 只看该作者
恩。。。答案是C,但是对E不大理解,能解释一下吗?
地板
发表于 2010-4-2 13:38:57 | 只看该作者
我的理解就是说原文没提不同种之间比较的事,所以E这个结论不是must be true。不过他这个解释写的够晦涩的
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2010-4-3 01:06:00 | 只看该作者
不过他这个解释写的够晦涩的
-- by 会员 TeamCancer (2010/4/2 13:38:57)



同感!就是想不通出题人怎么想得出这种选项的。。。费解
6#
发表于 2010-4-3 16:12:38 | 只看该作者
题目说few restriction--more ad--charge  more       E说most表示一个数目,没有比较的意思   当restriction减少的时候     应该是more  ad,而不是most  ad
7#
 楼主| 发表于 2010-4-4 16:46:08 | 只看该作者
题目说few restriction--more ad--charge  more       E说most表示一个数目,没有比较的意思   当restriction减少的时候     应该是more  ad,而不是most  ad
-- by 会员 wbb7631911 (2010/4/3 16:12:38)


恩。。。我觉得好像答案强调的是restriction被减少的情况,而E强调的是restriction的种类同其他的一致的情况,所以偏掉了。。。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-9 01:05
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部