The imposition of quotas limiting imported steel will not help the big American steel mills.In fact, the quotas will help "mini-mills" flourish in the United States.Those small domestic mills will take more business from the big American steel mills than would have been taken by the foreign steel mills in the absence of quotas.
Which of the following, if true, would cast the most serious doubt on the claim made in the last sentence above?
(A) Quality rather than price is a major factor in determining the type of steel to be used for a particular application.
(B) Foreign steel mills have long produced grades of steel comparable in quality to the steel produced by the big American mills.
(C) American quotas on imported goods have often induced other countries to impose similar quotas on American goods.
(D) Domestic "mini-mills" consistently produce better grades of steel than do the big American mills.
(E) Domestic "mini-mills" produce low-volume, specialized types of steel that are not produced by the big American steel mills.
答案选E，我当初做的时候在BE之间徘徊，一直没有搞懂。。看了其它贴子中的解答也不是很清楚。。。我觉得题目中最后一句话我一直没有搞懂啥是意思。。是说MM Mill从big mill 那抢来的份额比如果没有这个限额的话MM Mill被foreign Mill 抢来的更多吗？
那E是不是表达其实MM MIll生产的东西Big Mill根本 不生产，所以MM Mll根本 抢不了Big MIll的生意。。？？
再者B，我也觉得有一定道理。FOreign Mill和big mill 生产的是一样东西。。那有限额之后，原来foreign Mill的市场份额不就全归big MIll 所有了吗？那这样也是削弱了啊我觉得。。
求各位给个解答呢~
| 
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2013-4-7 10:50:14
收藏
收藏
