问有因无果，有果无因。谢谢大家！

TracyWei · 发表于 2010-5-9 13:34:35

近日在看，OG分类汇总。我做逻辑一直就是读懂就能差不多作对，没什么明确思路，现在遇到瓶颈，就想回头看看OG，总结一下做题思路。看到某大N的总结，对有因无果有果无音这个削弱的概念，不是很清楚。以题目为例，答案没有异议，希望大家给个解释。

31. Some who favor putting governmental enterprises into private hands suggest that conservation objectives would in general be better served if private environmental groups were put in charge of operating and financing the national park system, which is now run by the government.
结论： national park system由私人掌管->更好！
削弱：有因无果，由私人掌管不好。

Which of the following, assuming that it is a realistic possibility, argues most strongly against the suggestion above?
A. Those seeking to abolish all restrictions on exploiting the natural resources of the parks might join the private environmental groups as members and eventually take over their leadership. （这就是有因无果的一个很好的例子）
B. Private environmental groups might not always agree on the best ways to achieve conservation objectives. （不是best，也不一定就是不好啊，像这种一般般的词起不到削弱的作用）
C. If they wished to extend the park system, the private environmental groups might have to seek contributions from major donors and general public. （跟私人掌管的方式没有关系啊）
D. There might be competition among private environmental groups for control of certain park areas. （competition就一定不好吗？）
E. Some endangered species, such as the California condor, might die out despite the best efforts of the private environmental groups, even if those groups are not hampered by insufficient resources.

27. Red blood cells in which the malarial-fever parasite resides are eliminated from a person’s body after 120 days. Because the parasite cannot travel to a new generation of red blood cells, any fever that develops in a person more than 120 days after that person has moved to a malaria-free region is not due to the malarial parasite.
Premise: parasite can not travel
Conclusion: any, fever, >120 days不是因为malarial parasite
那么削弱就是是因为，有果无因

Which is the following, if true, most seriously weakens the conclusion above?
A. The fever caused by the malarial parasite may resemble the fever caused by flu viruses. （无关）
B. The anopheles mosquito, which is the principal insect carrier of the malarial parasite, has been eradicated in many parts of the world. （mosquito无关）
C. Many malarial symptoms other than the fever, which can be suppressed with anti-malarial medication, can reappear within 120 days after the medication is discontinued. （注意结论的具体性，是说fever，所以other than the fever是错误的）
D. In some cases, the parasite that causes malarial fever travels to cells of the spleen, which are less frequently eliminated from a person’s body than are red blood cells. （正确）
E. In any region infested with malaria-carrying mosquitoes, there are individuals who appear to be immune to malaria. （无关，没有出现parasite和fever）

问：有因无果是不是是指：同样的原因，产生的结果不一样；
有果无音是不是指：产生同样的结果，但是导致产生这种结果的原因不同

TracyWei · 发表于 2010-5-9 21:13:27

a a !!!!自己顶上去……大家看一下吧……万分感谢

TracyWei · 发表于 2010-5-10 11:12:36

。。。。。。期待中

Rebeldom · 发表于 2010-5-10 11:36:56

复杂贴,果断不看

vincent815 · 发表于 2010-5-10 19:53:03

果断帮顶

bonnie0715 · 发表于 2010-5-10 20:44:00

我首先没有看具体内容看最后一句话就觉得不对。。。怎么会有有过无音这种说法。不可能无因的。楼主是想说给出他因吧

bonnie0715 · 发表于 2010-5-10 20:46:49

然后看了贴，发现27不是给出他因，而是hasty generalization，一概而论找特例咯

TracyWei · 发表于 2010-5-11 19:59:36

确实有有果无音的说法……

TracyWei · 发表于 2010-5-11 20:02:47

一点拙见，
例如结论是：因为24小时上CD所以我gmat考了800分。
有因无果：24小时上CD我也没有考800分
有果无因：我没有24小时上CD，gmat也考了800分

这是一个同学给我的回复……我觉得例子特别生动也正是我要问的……share 一下……因为最初看那个总结是有点困惑的……但是这个例子我觉得特别好。

wellsli · 发表于 2012-9-17 22:23:02

好例子~

问有因无果，有果无因。谢谢大家！

所属分类: GMAT考试

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()