ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Guidebook writer: I have visited hotels throughout the country and have noticed that in those built before 1930 the quality of the original carpentry work is generally superior to that in hotels built afterward. Clearly carpenters working on hotels before 1930 typically worked with more skill, care, and effort than carpenters who have worked on hotels built subsequently.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the guidebook writer's argument?

正确答案: D

相关帖子

更多...

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 2592|回复: 6
打印 上一主题 下一主题

求助逻辑题

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-3-13 12:03:36 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
Guidebook writer: I have visited hotels throughout the country and have noticed that in those built before 1930
the quality of the original carpentry work is generally superior to that in hotels built afterward. Clearly carpenters
working on hotels before 1930 typically worked with more skill, care, and effort than carpenters who have
worked on hotels built subsequently.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the guidebook writer’s argument?
(A) The quality of original carpentry in hotels is generally far superior to the quality of original carpentry in
other structures, such as houses and stores.
(B) Hotels built since 1930 can generally accommodate more guests than those built before 1930.
(C) The materials available to carpenters working before 1930 were not signifi cantly different in quality from
the materials available to carpenters working after 1930.
(D) The better the quality of original carpentry in a building, the less likely that building is to fall into disuse and
be demolished.
(E) The average length of apprenticeship for carpenters has declined signifi cantly since 1930.

正确答案是D,但是OG后面的解释没看明白,请高人解答!
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2010-3-13 14:03:36 | 只看该作者
A无关
B无关
C排除它因——加强
D呈现它因(好品质是因为有要求,不是因为技艺不精——如果没有好品质,容易坍塌)——削弱
E显示因果关系的资料有效(因为之前花更多的时间学艺,所以技艺精湛)——加强
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2010-3-13 18:50:56 | 只看该作者
谢谢!是不是可以这样理解,1930年以前对造房子要求高,所以木匠活做得好,而1930年之后没要求了,做得就不如从前了?
地板
发表于 2010-3-13 21:00:00 | 只看该作者
恩恩是这样~
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2010-3-13 21:13:54 | 只看该作者
不知道是不是我水平有限,总觉得这一点很难想到啊。。。当初第一遍做得时候直接把这个选项排除了。。。
6#
发表于 2010-3-14 10:33:31 | 只看该作者
D项:1930以前建筑物中的木匠工艺越好,房子不用和倒塌的概率越小,就是说留到现在的房子都是质量较好的。
当然不能说是因为1930以前的木匠工艺好了,他们修的那些不好的早就不存在了。。。
7#
 楼主| 发表于 2010-3-14 11:45:02 | 只看该作者
我明白了。。。其实它这里的逻辑问题还是比较的样本不一致。。。这个人所拜访的1930年以前造的hotel都是好的完整保留下来的,而1930以后的hotel就是有好有坏的,所以这样就没法比了。。。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-17 01:54
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部