ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Although fullerenes--spherical molecules made entirely of carbon--were first found in the laboratory, they have since been found in nature, formed in fissures of the rare mineral shungite. Since laboratory synthesis of fullerenes requires distinctive conditions of temperature and pressure, this discovery should give geologists a test case for evaluating hypotheses about the state of the Earth's crust at the time these naturally occurring fullerenes were formed.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the argument?

正确答案: D

相关帖子

更多...

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 3275|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

请教一道PREP的题~

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-1-29 21:25:19 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
请教一道PREP的题~

Although fullerenes--spherical molecules made entirely of carbon--were first found in the laboratory, they have since been found in nature, formed in fissures of the rare mineral shungite.  Since laboratory synthesis of fullerenes requires distinctive conditions of temperature and pressure, this discovery should give geologists a test case for evaluating hypotheses about the state of the Earth's crust at the time these naturally occurring fullerenes were formed.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the argument?

(A) Confirming that the shungite genuinely contained fullerenes took careful experimentation.

(B) Some fullerenes have also been found on the remains of a small meteorite that collided with a spacecraft.

(C) The mineral shungite itself contains large amounts of carbon, from which the fullerenes apparently formed.

(D) The naturally occurring fullerenes are arranged in a previously unknown crystalline structure.

(E) Shungite itself is formed only under distinctive conditions.

E为什么不对呢

谢谢~~
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2010-1-31 17:51:42 | 只看该作者
顶~答案是D,我选的是B...请赐教~
板凳
发表于 2010-1-31 21:20:33 | 只看该作者
顶~答案是D,我选的是B...请赐教~
-- by 会员 littlecloud (2010/1/31 17:51:42)



我也在B和D之间犹豫,最后还是选了B,错了。

不过看了Manhattan的解释:

Tricky one. I agree B is tempting, but I think I'd go with D here.

Fullerenes found in lab first. (Does it really say "found"? Not created or something like that?)
Then were found in nature.
The lab fullerenes were synthesized at specific T and P.
Therefore, geologists should be able to tell something about T and P of Earth's crust when natural ones were formed.

Connection is the assumption that the way the fullerenes were formed in the lab is analogous to the way they were formed in nature.

I'd label choice B "slightly weakens" - it opens up the possibility that maybe the fullerenes found on Earth came from outer space. Doesn't mean they definitely did, though.

Then I get to D and realize it's better than B - it strongly undermines. The naturally occurring Earth fullerenes are definitely of a different structure than the lab-made ones. If that's the case, then I can't just assume that the process to make them in the lab is analogous to the process to make them naturally.
地板
发表于 2010-2-5 14:08:08 | 只看该作者
谢谢Prayer,而且确实B中的some不够有力。BTW, 我回忆起很多年以前的化学课,金刚石和石墨都是碳构成的,呵呵。。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-9-30 00:31
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部