请教一道kaplan得逻辑踢

crokfucrokfu · 发表于 2010-1-22 06:03:09

A psychologist is treating a patient with multiple personality disorder. One of the patient ’ s personalities claims to be a blind Civil War veteran. When exhibiting this personality, the patient responds in the affirmative when asked, only in a written format, whether he is blind. None of the patient ’ s other personalities claims to be blind. The psychologist concluded that the patient ’ s personality is fragmented, and that the veteran personality claims to be blind, while another personality responds to the written question.
Asking which of the following questions can reveal a flaw in the psychologist ’ s explanation?

  1.Why does the personality that answers the written question not answer “ No ” ?

  2.Why does the psychologist feel compelled to explain the patient ’ s responses?

  3.Why doesn ’ t another of the patient ’ s personalities convince the veteran personality that he can see?

  4.Why does the veteran personality claim to be blind, but none of the other personalities make this claim?

  5.Why don ’ t all the patient ’ s personalities claim to be blind?

正确答案是1

我没看懂得地方是When exhibiting this personality, the patient responds in the affirmative when asked, only in a written format, whether he is blind. 这句话什么意思阿?谢谢!

clarry · 发表于 2010-1-23 00:35:55

如果这为病人选的是No，那么表示他当时并不出在越南老兵的状态中。。是某种其他的人格在作答。所以1对。
lZ问的这句话的意思是：
当该病人显现出该人格并用书面的形式被问及他是否是盲人是。他的回答是肯定的。

请教一道kaplan得逻辑踢

所属分类: GMAT考试

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()