ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1413|回复: 0
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[求助] 大全TEST B NO. 2

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2009-12-4 10:12:26 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
In the years since the city of London imposed strict air-pollution regulations on local industry, the number of bird species seen in and around London has increased dramatically. Similar air-pollution rules should be imposed in other major cities.
Each of the following is an assumption made in the argument above EXCEPT:

(A) In most major cities, air-pollution problems are caused almost entirely by local industry.
(B) Air-pollution regulations on industry have a significant impact on the quality of the air.
(C) The air-pollution problems of other major cities are basically similar to those once suffered by London.
(D) An increase in the number of bird species in and around a city is desirable.
(E) The increased sightings of bird species in and around London reflect an actual increase in the number of species in the area.

正确答案: A

偶觉得A是不对,但是同时B也有问题。我已经看了论坛内关于这道题的讨论,还是觉得B有问题,理由如下:

题目推论是 因为"Air-pollution regulation on local industry" 导致 "鸟多",所以"需要在其他城市推广"
B是说 "Air-pollution regualtion on local industry" 会SIGNIFICANTLY影响空气质量。
1. 空气质量和鸟多不一定相关啊!
2.那Air-pollution regulation即使不会SIGNIFICANTLY影响空气质量,只要能影响到鸟类数量增多的程度,就应该在其他城市推广啊。
所以偶觉得B与题目也无关。
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-10-3 17:21
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部