ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2094|回复: 7
打印 上一主题 下一主题

WEAKEN题!难!期待解答

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2009-11-12 12:11:42 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
As a practical matter, the copper available for industrial use should not be thought of as limited by the quantity of copper deposits, known or unknown. The transmutation of one chemical element into another is a modern reality, through the methods of nuclear physics. Therefore, the quantity of a natural resource such as copper cannot be calculated even in principle, because copper can be made from other metals.

  Which of the following, if true, is the strongest argument against the argument above?

  (A) Although it is possible that additional deposits of copper will be found, geological considerations strongly indicate that they will not amount to more than a fifty-year supply.

  (B) The production of copper from other metals in industrial quantities would be prohibitively expensive in energy and materials.

  (C) Synthetic materials have been discovered that can serve as practical substitutes for copper in most of its uses.

  (D) It will be impractical, in the foreseeable future, to mine any deposits of metal that may exist on the Moon or on other planets.

  (E) Methods for estimating the amount of copper available in currently known deposits have become very sophisticated and have proved quite accurate.
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2009-11-12 12:50:09 | 只看该作者
是选B吗
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2009-11-12 13:29:54 | 只看该作者
是的 请问如何思考呢
地板
发表于 2009-11-12 15:11:37 | 只看该作者
As a practical matter, the copper available for industrial use should not be thought of as limited by the quantity of copper deposits, known or unknown. The transmutation of one chemical element into another is a modern reality, through the methods of nuclear physics. Therefore, the quantity of a natural resource such as copper cannot be calculated even in principle, because copper can be made from other metals.
铜的数量不应该被认为受到铜矿存储量的限制。通过核物理的方法,化学物之间的转换已经成为现实,所以,自然资源例如铜的数量不应该被计算,因为铜可以从其他物质制造
削弱:制造代价太大
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2009-11-12 15:25:33 | 只看该作者
还是不是太明白,是制造代价大所以不应被计算,属于他因削弱吗?制造代价大跟计算自然资源的数量有什么关系呢?盼回复 谢谢~
6#
发表于 2009-11-12 16:36:39 | 只看该作者
可能是我翻得不太好吧。。原文说不要这么斤斤计较铜的存储数量了,原因是反正铜可以从其他物质转变而来
削弱:虽然可以转,可是好贵,花费代价太大,所以还是要在乎自然界的铜的
7#
 楼主| 发表于 2009-11-12 17:45:14 | 只看该作者
好的 太感谢你了 方便留QQ吗 多多交流 O(∩_∩)O~
8#
发表于 2009-11-12 17:58:10 | 只看该作者
呵呵,我现在几乎不上QQ的,CD倒是天天上的,要找我的话在站内给我发短消息吧
MM什么时候考呀
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-1 16:52
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部