ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2422|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD-12-Q2:求助!

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2009-10-31 18:27:00 | 只看该作者

GWD-12-Q2:求助!

GWD-12-Q2:

Scientists are discussing ways to remove excess carbon dioxide from the atmosphere by increasing the amount that is absorbed by plant life.  One plan to accomplish this is to establish giant floating seaweed farms in the oceans.  When the seaweed plants die, they will be disposed of by being burned for fuel.

Which of the following, if true, would indicate the most serious weakness in the plan above?

 

A.      Some areas of ocean in the Southern Hemisphere do not contain sufficient nutrients to support large seaweed farms.

B.       When a seaweed plant is burned, it releases an amount of carbon dioxide comparable to the amount it has absorbed in its lifetime.

C.      Even if seaweed farms prove effective, some people will be reluctant to switch to this new fuel.

D.      Each year about seven billion tons of carbon dioxide are released into the atmosphere but only about five billion tons are absorbed by plant life.

E.       Seaweed farms would make more money by farming seaweed to sell as nutritional supplements than by farming seaweed to sell as fuel.

选B是懂的。但是这个A怎么错了?

沙发
发表于 2009-10-31 19:13:00 | 只看该作者
some 貌似不对吧, 不能有效的削弱...
板凳
发表于 2009-10-31 19:28:00 | 只看该作者
A可以这么想 营养物质并不是这个方案欠缺的,可以假设科学家可以提供一定的方法来解决这个营养物质的问题,也就是说这些海草能否生长并不是这个方案要考虑的。但方案中已经明确包括了When the seaweed plants die, they will be disposed of by being burned for fuel.所以既然要针对这个方案,就要从这个方案已经包括的内容下手。
[此贴子已经被作者于2009/10/31 19:29:13编辑过]
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-15 16:57
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部