ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1376|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

【求助】prep原版1-61

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2009-9-10 11:14:00 | 只看该作者

【求助】prep原版1-61

这套题看了半天也没看懂,还请大家指点,谢谢

61.   (34849-!-item-!-188;#058&007585)

Which of the following best completes the passage below?

At a recent conference on environmental threats to the North Sea, most participating countries favored uniform controls on the quality of effluents, whether or not specific environmental damage could be attributed to a particular source of effluent.  What must, of course, be shown, in order to avoid excessively restrictive controls, is that __________.

(A) any uniform controls that are adopted are likely to be implemented without delay

(A) any uniform controls that are adopted are likely to be implemented without delay

(B) any substance to be made subject to controls can actually cause environmental damage

(C) the countries favoring uniform controls are those generating the largest quantities of effluents

(D) all of any given pollutant that is to be controlled actually reaches the North Sea at present

(E) environmental damage already inflicted on the North Sea is reversible

答案是B


[此贴子已经被作者于2009/9/10 11:14:58编辑过]
沙发
发表于 2009-9-10 11:40:00 | 只看该作者

参与国家统一的认为应该控制所有污水质量,不管环境危害是不是可以追究到某一种污水上去(即: 一共ABCD四种污水,即使只有A有害环境,我还是要把A-D都控制住)。

但是问题是,万一这正有害的是气体E,A-D四中污水都对环境无害的话。。。。。

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2009-9-10 11:54:00 | 只看该作者

谢谢楼上,可是B选项说任何成为控制对象的物质都可能造成实际的环境伤害,不是应该有利于过度限制,而不是避免过度限制吗?

地板
发表于 2009-9-10 12:03:00 | 只看该作者

你要证明一下哪一项,才能避免过度控制?

我要证明所有我要控制的东西实际上都能造成环境危害。

如果不能证明这个,不就是说明我完全是在做无用功么。

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-9-29 22:24
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部