ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1801|回复: 5
打印 上一主题 下一主题

关于加强和假设

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2009-8-22 20:23:00 | 只看该作者

关于加强和假设

77. How do the airlines expect to prevent commercial plane
crashes? Studies have shown that pilot error contributes to two-thirds of all
such crashes. To address this problem, the airline have upgraded their training
programs by increasing the hours of classroom instruction and emphasizing
communication skills in the cockpit. But it is unrealistic to expect such
measures to compensate for pilots’ lack of actual flying time. Therefore, the
airlines should rethink their training approach to reducing commercial crashes.


                    

 


                    

Which one of the following is an assumption upon which the
argument depends?


                    

 


                    

A.       
Training
programs can eliminate pilot errors.


                    

B.       
Commercial
pilot routinely undergo additional training throughout their careers.


                    

C.       
The number
of airline crashes will decrease if pilot training programs focus on increasing
actual flying time.


                    

D.      
Lack of
actual flying time is an important contributor to pilot error in commercial
plane crashes.


                    

E.       
Communication
skills are not important to pilot training programs.


                    

 


                    

参考答案:D


                    

思路:xxxprogram 不能补充pilots lack
of actual flying time.
结论:thererfore, rethink approach to
prevent commercial plane crash.
中间有思维跳跃,actual flying
time
plane crash 什么关系?


                    

A.       
削弱,program can eliminate, so
do not need rethink approach


                    

B.        
无关。题中是prevent planes crashestraining.


                    

C.        
加强。


                    

D.       
actual flying time (pilot
error in) plane crashes
联系起来。对assumption取非:actual
flying time is not an important contributor to pilot error in commercial plane
crashes.
削弱结论。符合ETS假设定义。


                    

E.        
加强。

请教一下C是加强如何一眼看出,假设和加强有何分别?一直感觉假设就是加强的一种(把hidden premise补上)


[此贴子已经被作者于2009/8/22 20:24:39编辑过]
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2009-8-22 21:54:00 | 只看该作者
顶!困扰很久了,一直模模糊糊,一定要弄明白!
板凳
发表于 2009-8-22 23:25:00 | 只看该作者

这种题碰上我就死了 在我眼中cd没区别啊!!

地板
 楼主| 发表于 2009-8-23 14:43:00 | 只看该作者
哎,加强题总是很烦,预测答案预测不准
5#
发表于 2009-8-25 18:14:00 | 只看该作者
用加强、削弱来解题不是很合理。
题目的逻辑过程是pilot的error->2/3 crash。做某些事能较少pilot的error,所以会减少crash。做了什么事情呢?开始更新课程,增加介绍和沟通时间。但是这么做不能补偿缺乏实际飞行的时间,所以应该重新考虑。根据逻辑过程,缺乏实际飞行的时间肯定和crash有关系,但是文中没给出来,实际上比作者有个假设在里面。

下面是对假设题目解题思路的部分摘抄(lawyer)

    

找答案:答案分两类型:SUPPORT(填补推理上的概念GAP),DEFENDER(排除WEAKEN结论的可能性,即排除他因)。读原文,推理中有概念GAP(特别是答案出现新元素),则答案填补这个GAP(通常新元素必出现),否则找他因,排除推理中的WEAKNESS。最后用TEST检验或排除易混的答案。对于后一类用有关无关有时比较好,用结论的具体性和特殊性去分有关无关,排出剩下的用TEST

这里的support并不是指有了support就是正确选项,而是看是否填补了推理概念的GAP。用加强、削弱去考虑,不仅是舍近求远(判断起来也不容易呀),而且不一定正确。


6#
 楼主| 发表于 2009-8-29 11:42:00 | 只看该作者
谢谢!
D是典型的assumption里的supporter类型啦。可是在狒狒解释中认为C是加强题类型
而且加强和假设在有些题型真的很像哦。感觉假设有时候可以包括再加强里,所以其实已经是脱离此题问下一般性规律~~~


[此贴子已经被作者于2009/8/29 11:42:37编辑过]
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-10-9 23:44
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部