ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1559|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

大全1-17不太明白,NN帮忙解答下吧~

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-9-14 16:08:59 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
Companies considering new cost-cutting manufacturing processes often compare the projected results of making the investment against the alternative of not making the investment with costs, selling prices, and share of market remaining constant.

Which of the following, assuming that each is a realistic possibility, constitutes the most serious disadvantage for companies of using the method above for evaluating the financial benefit of new manufacturing processes?

(A) The costs of materials required by the new process might not be known with certainty.

(B) In several years interest rates might go down, reducing the interest costs of borrowing money to pay for the investment.

(C) Some cost-cutting processes might require such expensive investments that there would be no net gain for many years, until the investment was paid for by savings in the manufacturing process.

(D) Competitors that do invest in a new process might reduce their selling prices and thus take market share away from companies that do not.D

(E) The period of year chosen for averaging out the cost of the investment might be somewhat longer or shorter, thus affecting the result.
看了以前的讨论帖,如果按大家解释的理解确实应该选择D。但是如果cost,sales price,market share 不变,还怎么比较invest和not invest之间的区别呢?因为这个investment目的是要cost-cuting的,但是这里为什么还要在cost不变的前提下比较呢?
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2010-9-14 16:10:07 | 只看该作者
自己顶一下~不要沉呀~
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-2 16:08
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部