ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2543|回复: 6
打印 上一主题 下一主题

請教GWD7-Q5,謝謝

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2008-2-15 02:09:00 | 只看该作者

請教GWD7-Q5,謝謝

我搜尋過了,發現CD目前沒有這題的討論,想請大家指教,


    

GWD7-Q5:


    

Exposure
to certain chemicals commonly used in elementary schools as cleaners or pesticides
causes allergic reactions in some children. 
Elementary school nurses in Renston report that the proportion of
schoolchildren sent to them for treatment of allergic reactions to those
chemicals has increased significantly over the past ten years.  Therefore, either Renston’s schoolchildren
have been exposed to greater quantities of the chemicals, or they are more
sensitive to them than schoolchildren were ten years ago.


    

 


    

Which
of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?


    

 


    
  1. The number of
         school nurses employed by Renston’s elementary schools has not decreased
         over the past ten years.
  2. Children who are
         allergic to the chemicals are no more likely than other children to have
         allergies to other substances.
  3. Children who
         have allergic reactions to the chemicals are not more likely to be sent to
         a school nurse now than they were ten years ago.
  4. The chemicals
         are not commonly used as cleaners or pesticides in houses and apartment
         buildings in Renston.
  5. Children
         attending elementary school do not make up a larger proportion of
         Renston’s population now than they did ten years ago.    這題答案是C,請問B錯在哪?C又對在哪?

沙发
发表于 2008-2-15 03:29:00 | 只看该作者
B,原题一直在说某种allergy,B中说的allergies to other substances是irrelavent (况且也不是assumption,对其他物质的allergy对the proportion of schoolchildren sent to them for treatment of allergic reactions to THOSE chemicals 没有影响)

C对的原因是,原题的argument是送医院的比例上升了,所以要不exposure更大,要不学生现在变得更敏感了。要结论成立,那么“需要送医院”的定义就得consistent,如果现在不管情况如何,只要学生有一点点状况都会被送到医院(而以前要情况严重到某个程度才会被送医院),那么原题的argument就不成立了。
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2008-2-15 11:17:00 | 只看该作者
謝謝回應,我懂了
地板
发表于 2009-7-6 16:09:00 | 只看该作者
neo1001的解释好像说反了,C说 are not more likely to be sent to a school nurse now than they were ten years ago
5#
发表于 2009-7-19 16:26:00 | 只看该作者
UP
6#
发表于 2012-5-7 09:09:09 | 只看该作者
为什么不选E??
7#
发表于 2012-5-7 12:41:37 | 只看该作者
C:送去校医院的频率下降,但过敏总人数依然上升,可以说明therefore之后的结论。

E:  是将儿童人口与该地的总人口数的比例下降,不能说明儿童绝对数值是上升还是下降,因此说明不了结论。
如果E项能说明儿童总人数是下降的,那么过敏总人数反而多,则也能说明结论的
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-30 13:55
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部