|
携隐版GWD-1-40 Until mow, only injectable vaccines against influenza have been available. Parents are reluctant to subject children to the pain of injections, but adults, who are at risk of serious complications from influenza, are commonly vaccinated. A new influenza vaccine, administered painlessly in a nasal spray, is effective for children. However, since children seldom develop serious complications from influenza, no significant public health benefit would result from widespread vaccination of children using the nasal spray.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
A. Any person who has received the injectable vaccine can safely receive the nasal-spray vaccine as well. B. The new vaccine uses the same mechanism to ward off influenza as jnjectable vaccines do. C. The injectable vaccine is affordable for all adults. D. Adults do not contract influenza primarily from children who have influenza. E. The nasal spray vaccine is mot effective when administered to adults. 答案是D。用取否看了一下，就是成人主要是由于受了小孩传染得了流感，所以新疫苗还是有用。但是题干当中有成年人一般都接种了疫苗啊，也就是： 小孩得流感不会有serious complication， 但是很多大人会被小孩传染，但同时大人已经vaccinated，所以结论还是成立的啊。 没有想通这个问题，请各位指教，不胜感激～～！！ | 
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2006-11-21 20:08:00
楼主
