ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1939|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[求助]陈向东逻辑 反对题61

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-3-1 13:23:00 | 只看该作者

[求助]陈向东逻辑 反对题61

61 Seven countries signed a treaty binding each of them to perform specified actions on a certain fixed date, with the actions of each conditional on simultaneous action taken by the other countries. Each country was also to notify the six other countries when it had completed its action.


The simultaneous-action provision of the treaty leaves open the possibility that


(A) the compliance date was subject to postponement, according to the terms of the treaty


(B) one of the countries might not be required to make any changes or take any steps in order to comply with the treaty, whereas all the other countries are so required


(C) each country might have a well-founded excuse, based on the provision, for its own lack of compliance


(D) the treaty specified that the signal for one of the countries to initiate action was notification by the other countries that they had completed action


(E) there was ambiguity with respect to the date after which all actions contemplated in the treaty are to be complete


这题让我郁闷了很久,看了半天也不明白,请大家帮帮忙!


该题应该如何进行逻辑分析?逻辑关系是怎样的?为什么会得到C这个答案?是如何进行逻辑推导的?


fficeffice" />    

沙发
发表于 2004-3-1 15:57:00 | 只看该作者
简单地说就是谁也不肯先动。
板凳
发表于 2004-3-1 16:05:00 | 只看该作者
The excuse is: if one country fail to comply the treaty, it can explain that    other country may violate to comply the treaty as an alibi.
地板
发表于 2004-3-2 13:06:00 | 只看该作者
补充材料上有道一样的题目,第60可以看看。


题目读懂了就可以了。题目意思是说“七个国家行动的前提是另外六个国家已经行动并且互相通报”也就是Jolvo and weiyu 说的一样

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-10-10 04:50
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部