ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1424|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[求助]OG11-132 p390

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2009-8-2 20:30:00 | 只看该作者

[求助]OG11-132 p390

132 The passage suggests that C.Vann Woodward and Thoman Paine were similar in all of the following ways EXCEPT

 A both had works published in the midest of important historical events

 B both wrote works that enjoyed widespread popularity

 C both exhibited an understanding of the relevance of historical evidence to contemporary issues

 D the works of both had a significant effect on events following their publication

 E both were able to set aside worries about historical anachronism in order to reach and inspire

答案:E

我选的A

 OG给的关于A的解释:Paine's work was published at the start of the American Revolution; Woodward's work was published at the beginning of the Civil Rights movement  而A中说的都发表在重要历史事件中间啊 不就错了么 那不就Except了么

关于E的解释:The author states that Paine was not a historian and thus not concerned with accuracy or the dangers of historical anachronism. Woodward was a historian and so had to be concerned about historical anachronism.

why?

原文:Paine had intended to reach and inspire: he was not a historian and thus not concerned with accuracy or the dangers of historical anachronism. Yet, like Paine, Woodward had an unerring sense of the revolutionary moment...这里不说了like 了吗 所以两人都set aside worries about historical anachronism 这样理解错在哪?

钻到这个死胡同了,求助大家,谢谢了

沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2009-8-2 20:41:00 | 只看该作者
欸~~来人啊~~
板凳
发表于 2009-8-3 22:05:00 | 只看该作者
我的个人观点是:对于选项A,我把midst理解为历史事件中,所以2个人的举动都是发生在历史事件刚开始,应该属于midst的范围;对于选项E肯定是不对的,原文中的Yet,表示转折,说明C同学是个历史学家,不像T同学,需要对历史准确性负责。
不知道这样的理解是否正确,大家多多讨论~
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2009-8-4 21:48:00 | 只看该作者
谢谢~~觉得蛮有道理的~
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-9-8 13:04
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部