ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 6560|回复: 6
打印 上一主题 下一主题

求教OG 12 -45,拜托大家了

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-7-18 12:18:37 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
45.Some anthropologists study modern-day societies of foragers in an effort to learn about our ancient ancestors who were also foragers. A flaw in this strategy is that forager societies are extremely varied. Indeed, any forager society with which anthropologists are familiar has had considerable contact with modern, non-forager societies.
Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the criticism made above of the anthropologists' strategy?
(A)All forager societies throughout history have had
a number of important features in common that
are absent from other types of societies.

(B)Most ancient forager societies either dissolved
or made a transition to another way of life.

(0All anthropologists study one kind or another of
modern-day society.

(D)Many anthropologists who study modern-day
forager societies do not draw inferences about
ancient societies on the basis of their studies.

(E)Even those modern-day forager societies that
have not had significant contact with modern
societies are importantly different from ancient
forager societies.

答案是A
题目:The argument 反对比较现代和古代的foraging societies,因为两点原因:1现存foraging societies的多样性,2现在的foraging societies与现在的non-foraging societies接触多。看哪个选项使这个批评削弱。
我想问的是D选项的解释 说人类学家可能认为这个comparision是没用的,为什么就没有weaken这个argument呢?
说comparision没用不与削弱这个批评到底有什么样的不同,我感觉有一点,但是还是想不清楚。
拜托大家帮我看看咯。
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2010-7-23 22:56:47 | 只看该作者
"weaken the criticism"意思就是supporting the anthropologists~
所以只能选A我觉得
板凳
发表于 2010-7-23 23:20:10 | 只看该作者
D:whether anthropologists draw inferences has no relationship with the topic.
A: the article said that we cannot use modern  foragers to analyze ancient ancestors because they had considerable contacts with non-forager societies. But A said:there are  important features in common within foragers  which non-forager societies don't have
地板
发表于 2010-7-23 23:32:37 | 只看该作者
同意1楼。绕来绕去其实就是问怎么支持原来做法。
D与主题无关,没有涉及到现在的研究
5#
发表于 2011-8-7 20:37:23 | 只看该作者
D:whether anthropologists draw inferences has no relationship with the topic.
A: the article said that we cannot use modern  foragers to analyze ancient ancestors because they had considerable contacts with non-forager societies. But A said:there are  important features in common within foragers  which non-forager societies don't have
-- by 会员 buda (2010/7/23 23:20:10)



这个是因为premise里的extremly varied吧...A说common正好对应premise里的varied, weaken...
6#
发表于 2012-4-20 08:53:30 | 只看该作者
D. 考古学家的strategy是研究现在了解过去,如果他们"do not draw inferences about ancient societies on the basis of their studies."那说明他们的stategy没用咯,不选
7#
发表于 2019-6-17 16:08:42 | 只看该作者
看题目:in an effort to learn about our ancestors.
所以如果按照D所说,人类学家们研究现代foragers不是为了得出有关古代社会的结论,那就连他们最初研究的目的in effort to都否定了,那这个研究方法就是彻彻底底地失败了啊。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-12 10:52
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部