ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1561|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

TTgwd1-29

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2009-5-27 17:10:00 | 只看该作者

TTgwd1-29

咋这题没人问。。

Q29:

Smithtown
     University
’s fund-raisers succeeded in getting donations from 80 percent of the potential donors they contacted.  This success rate, exceptionally high for university fund-raisers, does not indicate that they were doing a good job.  On the contrary, since the people most likely to donate are those who have donated in the past, good fund-raisers constantly try less-likely prospects in an effort to expand the donor base.  The high success rate shows insufficient canvassing effort.

Which of the following, if true, provides more support for the argument?

  1. Smithtown University’s fund-raisers were successful in their contacts with potential donors who had never given before about as frequently as were fund-raisers for other universities in their contacts with such people.
  2. This year the average size of the donations to Smithtown University from new donors when the university’s fund-raisers had contacted was larger than the average size of donations from donors who had given to the university before.
  3. This year most of the donations that came to Smithtown University from people who had previously donated to it were made without the university’s fund-raisers having made any contact with the donors.
  4. The majority of the donations that fund-raisers succeeded in getting for Smithtown University this year were from donors who had never given to the university before.
  5. More than half of the money raised by Smithtown University’s fund-raisers came from donors who had never previously donated to the university.

这题答案是C。我选了个B。。。其实这题我不太读得懂题目意思。。哎。。求教牛牛们,这题如何推理呀~


[此贴子已经被作者于2009-5-31 11:09:53编辑过]
沙发
发表于 2009-5-27 18:08:00 | 只看该作者
板凳
发表于 2009-5-27 22:18:00 | 只看该作者

个人觉得是C。理由如下

首先,要分清题目要你支持的是哪一方provides more support for the argument,,说的是让你支持反对Smithtown
                        University
’s fund-raisers的人。而不是去支持Smithtown
                        University
’s fund-raisers

A的话,支持了Smithtown
                                University
’s fund-raisers。与题目要支持的相反。错

B的话,跟A同样的毛病。

C的话,说大多数捐钱的,Smithtown
                                    University
’s fund-raisers,都没去联系过。反对Smithtown
                                        University
’s fund-raisers.也就是支持反对Smithtown
                                                University
’s fund-raisers的人。

请NN指教

地板
发表于 2009-5-28 01:33:00 | 只看该作者

我也觉得是C.

多新的人捐钱才说明募捐成功,所以如果大部分捐款来自之前的捐款人,就说明募捐不成功.

文中结论是募捐不成功,若要支持该结论,则需要证明新的捐款人捐款占少或老的捐款人捐款占多.

A.学校找到很多新的捐款人 --> 削弱结论

B.新的捐款人捐款份额比老的多 --> 削弱结论

C.大部分捐款都是来自老的 --> 支持结论.

5#
 楼主| 发表于 2009-5-31 11:18:00 | 只看该作者
哦~明白了~原来已经有前人讨论过了~gwd版本不一样竟然没找到。。多谢上面几位好人~
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-30 05:33
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部