review is just an academic activity which could send some good/bad signals to the editor. And editors are the ones who decide, while the advice of reviewers count to a large extent. So rejecting a trash paper will highlight you to the editor, but rejecting a good paper will downgrade you.
以下是引用darcie在2009/10/12 22:42:00的发言： review is just an academic activity which could send some good/bad signals to the editor. And editors are the ones who decide, while the advice of reviewers count to a large extent. So rejecting a trash paper will highlight you to the editor, but rejecting a good paper will downgrade you.
One of the 2 reviewers gave a rejection but I still get the opportunity to revise and resubmit the paper. My problem is , who will decide the publication of the paper when resubmited to the editor? The reviewer have firstly rejected me? No...
Normally, most assistant professors cannot get tenure at top tier universities but they would like to try their ability and to get a high income first.
Choosing a reviewer is not based on the publications on that journal. The reviewer may publish good papers in other journals which show the ability already.
Peer review, of course, is not absolutely fair. The editior knows which reviewers provide high acceptance rate. Some editors even give the paper to the authors' ex-supervisors for review.
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2009-10-12 08:36:00
