ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, a technique called proton-induced X-ray emission, which can quickly analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destroying it, is finding uses in medicine, archaeology, and criminology.

正确答案: A

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 11425|回复: 62
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG13-SC106 A选项 - 主谓离得有点远?

  [复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2013-1-17 12:45:16 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
107.Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, a
technique called proton-induced X-ray emission, which
can quickly analyze the chemical elements in almost
any substance without destroying it,
is finding uses in
medicine, archaeology, and criminology.



(A)Originally developed for detecting air pollutants,
a technique called proton-induced X-ray
emission, which can quickly analyze the
chemical elements in almost any substance
without destroying it,

(B)Originally developed for detecting air pollutants,
having the ability to analyze the chemical
elements in almost any substance without
destroying it, a technique called proton-induced
X-ray emission

(C)A technique originally developed for detecting
air pollutants, called proton-induced X-ray
emission, which can quickly analyze the
chemical elements in almost any substance
without destroying it,

(D)A technique originally developed for detecting
air pollutants, called proton-induced X-ray
emission, which has the ability to analyze the
chemical elements in almost any substance
quickly and without destroying it,
(E)      A technique that was originally developed for
detecting air pollutants and has the ability to
analyze the chemical elements in almost any
substance quickly and without destroying the
substance, called proton-induced X-ray emission,


虽说比较下来,我能够认可

A选项

作为正确答案。
但我还是有个小小的疑惑~
一般来说主谓之间隔着千山万水的,都会认为是错的,而这里加上了which引导的非限制性条件状语从句,就对了~
请问什么情况下,主谓不可以隔着千山万水,而什么时候又可以呢?


谢谢!
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2013-1-17 12:56:38 | 只看该作者
"主谓之间隔着千山万水的,都会认为是错的" -->不太认同这个判断准则...
板凳
发表于 2013-1-17 13:25:57 | 只看该作者
同意LS啊。而且也没有隔千山万水吧,prep里还有更长的句子呢
这句话是因为,其他四个选项都有明显的错误;而A中主谓虽然离得远,但并不影响意思的理解,所以A is the best! 。

lz仔细看CDE和A 的区别,把technology和called。。。分开,是把原来的essential modifier变成了non-essential modifier,从意思上来说就错了。而B则是两个连续的modifier错误,这是以前几个斑竹讨论过的著名的夹心修饰的错误。
地板
发表于 2013-3-3 22:35:50 | 只看该作者
我很好奇C为什么不对,A的which 怎么就不会修饰emissions了?
5#
发表于 2013-4-4 23:18:47 | 只看该作者
对这道题有疑问
6#
发表于 2013-5-5 10:44:08 | 只看该作者
求问什么叫夹心修饰?
7#
发表于 2013-5-12 13:26:41 | 只看该作者
, 哈哈....
8#
发表于 2013-5-12 15:48:51 | 只看该作者
说到底这还是跟跳跃修饰有关,什么情况下可以被分开来不会有歧义。

B的错误是什么 呢
9#
发表于 2013-5-20 15:47:51 | 只看该作者
THXXXXXXXXXX
10#
发表于 2013-5-20 21:08:10 | 只看该作者
A选项的主谓其实离得不远啊。
这句句子去掉修饰的话,其实就是 a technique is finding uses in medicine, archaeology, and criminology。
其中句首分词短语 Originally developed for detecting air pollutants修饰主语a technique。主语后面紧跟着的called proton-induced X-ray emission同样也是修饰主语。逗号+which 作为非限定性定语从句,其先行词是proton-induced X-ray emission。
B,D,E有明显的错误。
当时我在C和A之间纠结了一下。C的错误在于developed 和 called 之间需要加上and,是并列关系,否则的话两个分词短语之间的关系不清不楚。A将2个分词短语放在主语一前一后,表达清楚。

不认同的请指点啊,谢谢。

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-26 09:48
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部