ChaseDream
搜索
1234567
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: waytous
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG13-SC106 A选项 - 主谓离得有点远?

  [复制链接]
61#
发表于 2015-9-22 18:12:51 | 只看该作者
同疑惑,根据OG上的解释,为何同样都是“...emission, which..."结构,只有C选项“relative clause introduced
by which incorrectly and illogically modifies emission.” A选项就没有which修饰emission的嫌疑?

另外不太同意之前某楼的童鞋说的portion-induced X-ray emission是句子主语,它是作为called...开头的noun modifier的一个组成部分而存在,a technique应该才是句子主语&which所要修饰的先行词。

62#
发表于 2015-9-24 17:17:01 | 只看该作者
stella要去英国 发表于 2013-3-3 22:35
我很好奇C为什么不对,A的which 怎么就不会修饰emissions了?

同问,明明两个which都是跟在emission,后面的,不是应该就近修饰emission吗
63#
发表于 2015-9-24 17:25:04 | 只看该作者
在别的帖子看到的,由erkuai9526提供,我从曼哈顿直接贴过来哈
The difference is in the placement of the various phrases.

A: "(opening modifier), (noun) (modified by necessary descriptive phrase), which" - in this structure, which refers to the noun. Note that the few words right after "technique" are simply the name of that technique. These words ("technique called proton-induced X-ray emission") collectively make up the extended noun phrase to which "which" refers. The single-word noun is technique but the other words are necessary to understand what technique we're talking about.

C: "(Noun) (modifier), (modifer), which" - in this structure, we've separated what had been the necessary descriptive phrase from the noun, so it is no longer a part of any extended noun phrase. As a result, the "which" in this case really does only apply to "emission" rather than to a "technique called emission" b/c "a technique called emission" as a simple noun phrase, is no longer part of the sentence.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-25 22:16
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部